Learning Objectives

Explain the theoretical foundations of program policies group ratio and size using knowledge about child development and learning including variations in beliefs about children’s development and behavioral norms as a function of community and cultural contexts. (NAEYC standard 1c; MA Core Competency 7.A.1 @ mid-level & 7.A.3 @ initial level)

Compare exemplary program practices as defined by NAEYC to those observed or reported a EEC licensed program in the areas of group ratio and size (Area 6 of the EEC Program Standards), noting areas of strength and identifying areas for improvement, making explicit suggestions for how to implement improvements. (MA Core Competency 8.A.4 @ mid-level, 8.D.13 & 7.C.7 @ initial level)

Uses effective oral and written communication, and non-verbal and listening skills. (MA Core Competency 8.B.7 @ initial level)

Overview

Early educators provide children with physical care, reassurance, social support, and safeguard their well-being. Several professional organizations such as the American Public Health Association; American Academy of Pediatrics, and NAEYC provide recommendations for group size, and child–staff ratio.  See  the Teacher-Child Ratios within the Group Size Chart 

Continuity of personnel is important for children to establish emotional connections with educators. When the turnover rates among personnel is high, it is difficult for programs to provide the care children need. Studies suggest that the child–staff ratio is associated with children’s peer interactions (Deynoot-Schaub & Riksen-Walraven, 2006; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 1999, 2006, 2008), but not in a consistent manner. Some studies have suggested that across a range of child–staff ratios, a larger number of children per caregiver is associated with more peer interactions (Deynoot-Schaub & Riksen-Walraven, 2006; NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 2008). Yet other studies have suggested that with a large number of children per caregiver, the number of interactions and their quality decreases (NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 1999; Vandell & Powers, 1983).

Initiatives to enhance quality encourage programs are to lower child–staff ratios in order to achieve greater quality in children’s services. However, lowering the ratio standard is expensive to implement.  A recent study defines optimal ratios as:

 Optimal Children to Educator Ratios

3:1 at 6 months

3–4:1 at 15 months

4–5:1 at 24 months

6–7:1 at 36 months

10:1 at 54 months

“Optimal child–staff ratios across the child care period are associated with a higher frequency of peer interactions, especially positive interactions, for children ages 3 and 4.5 years and with higher quality play with a friend at age 4.5 years. Furthermore, the mid-range (optimal) child–staff ratio is associated with better peer skills.”

Reli Iluz, Esther Adi-Japha & Pnina S. Klein (2016) Identifying Child–Staff Ratios That Promote Peer Skills in Child Care, Early Education and Development, 27:7, 1077-1098, DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2016.1175240

We should strive for optimal child-staff ratios.  We are required to meet the licensing regulations which can be difficult to read and interpret.  I pulled out some of the relevant regulations regarding Group size and Ratio for center-based group care.  There are differences in the regulations for family child care homes or in an out of school time programs. Please read the regulations for more information.

  • At least one qualified administrator below must be on the premises full time during the hours of program operation.
  • The program must maintain documentation of appropriate staffing at all times, including when regularly assigned educators are absent due to illness, personal business or vacation.

7.10 Ratios, Group Sizes and Supervision of Children.

The following requirements apply to all programs, including family child care, small group and school age and large group and school age child care.

  • The program must maintain sufficient numbers of qualified staff to promote the health, safety, growth and development of each child. Assignment of staff must take into account the physical environment, requirements of the activities children are engaged in, and the developmental levels and behavioral traits of children in care.
  • Ratios: The program must have the number of educators necessary to:

(a) ensure adequate supervision of the group at all times;

(b) provide individual attention to children; and

(c) promote their physical, social, emotional and cognitive development.

Staff Included in Ratios.

  • For purposes of calculating staff: child ratios, staff shall include only those EEC-qualified persons who are assigned to care for children for specific hours of the day.
  • Volunteers and student interns shall not be included in staff: child ratios unless they are at least 16 years of age (in Small and Large Group and School Age Child Care) or at least 18 years of age (in Family Child Care) and are assigned to the program for at least three months.

Group Assignment of Children

  • All group assignments must be developmentally appropriate for the individual child.
  • The group size must be appropriate for the activities planned and for the characteristics of children assigned to the group.
  • Each child must be assigned to a consistent group with consistent staffing.

Fixed Age Grouping

Children may be assigned to groups with others within their same age range, as specified by EEC. The fixed age group ratios and groupings below may be used by large group and school age child care programs.

Regulation Number Age Group / Full or Half Day Program Maximum Group Size Educator / Child Ratio Educator Qualifications
7.10(9)(b)1 Infants (up to 15 months old)

(Full or Half Day)

7 1: 3, 1 additional educator for 4 – 7 infants At least 1 Infant/Toddler Teacher
7.10(9)(b)2 Toddlers (15 to 33 months)

(Full or Half Day)

9 1:4, 1 additional educator for 5 – 9 toddlers At least 1 Infant/Toddler Teacher
7.10(9)(b)3 Preschoolers

33 months to school age

(Full Day)

20 1:10 At least 1 Preschool Teacher
7.10(9)(b)4 Preschoolers

33 months to school age

(Half Day)

24 1:12 At least 1 Preschool Teacher
7.10(9)(b)5 Kindergarten (attending first grade the following year) 30 1:15 At least 1 Preschool Teacher
7.10(9)(b)6 School Age 26 1:13 At least 1 Group Leader

Putting on your administrator’s hat, how will you cross the bridge between regulations and best practices?  To guide you across the bridge read Area 6 of the Early Childhood Program Standards For Three and Four Year Olds Early Childhood.

What aspects of group size and ratio do I look at?

To write the narrative about group size and ratio, you will need to collect the staff schedule and review the Employee Handbook for information such as vacation and break policies from employee handbook. The staff schedule will look something like this:

Consider these questions as you examine the schedule:

  • How does your program handle days when the number of children at the program vary hour to hour and day to day?
  • Does the program have and fund substitute educators in cases of illness?
  • What happens when educators leave their job?
  • When do educators set up classrooms, develop activities or prepare materials?

EEC provides forms to use for group size and ratio.   Make sure to review:

Reading and Resources

Deynoot-Schaub, M. J. G., & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. (2006). Peer contacts of 15-month-olds in child care: Links with child temperament, parent-child interaction, and quality of child care. Social Development, 15, 710–729. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00366.x

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (1999). Child outcomes when child-care center classes meet recommended standards for quality. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1072–1077. doi:10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1072

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2006). Child care effect sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. American Psychologist, 61, 99–116. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.2.99

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2008). Social competence with peers in third grade: Associations with earlier peer experiences in child care. Social Development, 17, 419–453. doi:10.1111/sode.2008.17.issue-3

Vandell, D. L., & Powers, C. P. (1983). Day care quality and children’s free play activities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 493–500. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1983.tb03393.x

 Summary

After reading and completing challenges you should be able to:

Explain the theoretical foundations of program policies regarding group size and ratio using knowledge about child development and learning including variations in beliefs about children’s development and behavioral norms as a function of community and cultural contexts as seen in your narrative draft.

Compare exemplary program practices as defined by NAEYC to those observed or reported a EEC licensed program in the area of group ratio and size  noting areas of strength and identifying areas for improvement, making explicit suggestions for how to implement improvements as seen in your narrative draft.

Uses effective written communication skills while completing the Blackboard discussion where you share sections from an Employee Handbook.

 

Challenges

Challenge 1:

After reading the articles about group ratio and size, interview the program administrator at your field placement site.   Here are questions to ask:

  1. In the next 18 months, what are your major concerns? How does the list compare the list of page 70 in the article Examining Beliefs and Behaviors?
  2. Is there a systematic way to ensure that teacher‐to‐child ratios and group sizes are maintained at all times?
  3. What is your program’s policy in the event that a staff member is ill?
  4. What is your turn-over rate? What are the reasons for staff turn-over?
  5. How do you recruit people to hire?
  6. What is the procedure for hiring?
  7. What do you look for in the way of characteristics and qualifications when hiring new teachers?
  8. How does your program minimize regrouping children in order to maintain teacher to child ratios and groups sizes?
  9. What are your program’s policies on leaving one staff member alone with a child or group of children? What are the procedures for staff communication if a staff member is left to supervise children alone, even for a short time period?
  10. Is there a systematic process to ensure that all staff members receive training on topics related to health and safety, including supervision?
  11. Does your program support participation in trainings, for example, by providing staff members time away from children to attend trainings during the day, by providing financial assistance to cover the cost of the training, or by compensating staff for the time needed to attend the training?

 

Challenge 2

 

 You will write 3 sections; the importance, interpretation, and reflection.

  1. Why is Program Standards Area 6: GROUP RATIO AND SIZE essential to quality education and care?

    Expand on the purpose from the MA Program StandardsThe program will have the number of staff necessary to ensure adequate group supervision at all times and to provide individual attention to children and to promote their physical, social, emotional, and cognitive development. (p. 27)

Include a thorough discussion of how group ratio and size reflect best practices and contributes to overall program quality. How do children and families benefit from appropriate group ratio and size?

Your interpretation of the evidence where you compare your classroom and program to the program policies.

Are the policies implemented in the classroom in which you are working?  Give specific examples you have observed and reference the evidence you collected.   How does your classroom and program comply with the Program Standards in Area 6: GROUP RATIO AND SIZE? (pages 27-28).  Remember to address

  • The Program meets or exceeds the requirements for staffing and group size
  • The program maintains at least minimum STAFF/CHILD RATIOS
  • The program adheres to minimum standards for group SIZE AND RATIO

Summative reflections, relative to GROUP RATIO AND SIZE

Overall, how well do you see the program and your classroom doing in this area of program quality? In your opinion, is the program and your classroom particularly strong in some aspect of this standards area?  Are there “next steps” that you would recommend to make the program and your classroom even stronger in this standards area?  If you have unlimited resources, what might you recommend?  Include detailed conclusions that draw upon a range of indicators and are richly supported by the evidence.

 

GROUP RATIO AND SIZE SAMPLE

Examples

Why is this essential to quality education and care?

Intentionally not included.  You will need to complete this section before submitting a draft.

Interpretation How does your classroom and program comply with the Program Standards?

The program meets the requirements for staffing in terms of group size and ratio. Being in a toddler preschool classroom, the group size and ratio is one that would be different as it has two different age groups in it. However, the classroom keeps the ratio low and reflects that of what is seen in a standard toddler classroom. The teachers follow this ratio as the students in this room go from the toddler age group and transition into young preschool in this same room before moving across the hall into the preschool itself. The toddler-preschool classroom has a ratio of 2:9 (in regards to the toddler age group) and 1:5 (in regards to the preschool age group) (See Appendix C, Evidence #1A & #1B). In this classroom there are two teachers (one head teacher and one assistant) and eight children (See Appendix C, Evidence #2). The children in the center are appropriately supervised at all times while attending the program. There are always two teachers present in the classroom as the director keeps enough staff on site to cover lunches, breaks, bus-pick, and transitions (See Appendix C, Evidence #3 & #4). In the toddler preschool classroom there is also a volunteer grandma from the Foster Grandparent Program (Employee Handbook, 4-5) who helps out a few times a week under the supervision of the two teachers in the room. According to the Health & Safety manual, “substitutes and volunteers work under direct supervision and are not left alone with a group of children at any time” (Health & Safety manual, 5-2). Information pertaining to students and volunteers is also stated in the Employee Handbook under section 4-5. There is an attendance log in the classroom that the teachers use to mark if children are present, absent, late, or have departed for the day (See Appendix C, Evidence #5).  The attendance log is brought with the group when they leave the room and aides in helping the teacher reference the number of children accounted for. Children in this classroom also periodically leave with guardians and/or DCF workers (depending on who is listed as having authorization to pick them up) (See Appendix C, Evidence #6) for scheduled visits with parents that occur offsite. If and when a child is picked up and taken off site, the person taking the child is required to sign them out as well as back in when they arrive back at the program. The same arrival and departure log is used when the child arrives at the program and leaves at the end of the day (See Appendix C, Evidence #7). The director along with the staff works to ensure that the group size in the classroom is appropriate and suitable for the age group so there is proper supervision and opportunities for relationship based learning to take place.

Summative reflections

Overall, I believe the program does a great job in terms of meeting the appropriate standards for group size and ratio. Having two teachers on site at all times ensures the children’s safety and also allows for proper supervision. The director follows the appropriate steps by making sure she has enough staff scheduled each day to make sure all breaks are covered and that each classroom is in accordance with their ratio at all times. The director also moves about the rooms throughout the course of the day to “check-in” and also take part in the learning that is going, acting as an extra set of eyes in the classroom and ensuring that appropriate learning, supervision, and care are taking place. The teachers adhere to the appropriate staff to child ratio throughout the course of the day and do not leave the program until the children in their classroom have left or the number of children has declined (now allowing for less staff).

If I had the ability to change or add to this standard in any way, I would consider having the program hire an extra staff member to simply move about the rooms in the way the director does periodically. By doing this, the classrooms will have extra help and someone who can move about the center for them to retrieve materials, check if the playground is open, communicate with the director/relay messages and so on. This “floater” would also bring new insight to the classroom and act as another role model for the children to learn and grow from.

Another change I would make to the center would be to add more classrooms or space for more children to enroll. To keep in accordance with the ratio, the director may have a difficult time finding the space for the children in this program as there is only one infant room, one toddler-preschool room, and one preschool. By adding more classrooms, the director would have the space to enroll more children and hire more educators which would in turn benefit the program itself and many children, families, and job seeking educators in the area.

 

 

License

Share This Book