339 Weinergate: The Almost Totally Unknown Story of How the Girl in Weiner’s Sexting Case Lied to Hurt Hillary Clinton
đ Weinergate: The Almost Totally Unknown Story of How the Girl in Weiner’s Sexting Case Lied to Hurt Hillary Clinton
đŽ Trumpâs Prophetic Tweet: 2015
Then came Trumpâs eerily accurate prediction. Less than a month after declaring his candidacy, he tweeted:
âIt came out that Huma Abedin knows all about Hillaryâs private illegal emails. Humaâs PR husband, Anthony Weiner, will tell the world.â
It was August 2015. Weiner had just started a brief stint at a PR firm. Trumpâs tweet wasnât just a jabâit was a forecast. He knew Weinerâs weakness. He knew the GOPâs playbook. And he knew that if Weiner could be baited again, it could take down Clinton.
Just call him Donald Nostradamus Trump. For all his baseless boasts, Trump hasnât gotten the credit he deserves for predicting Weinergate more than a year before it happened. In early August 2015, he tweeted about Weiner being a liability to Clintonâand on October 28, 2016, that liability helped win him the presidency.
Howâs that for âWeiner telling the worldâ?
Strangely, this is the one thing Trump hasnât taken credit forâdespite it being one of the few times he actually deserves it.
âThat August 3 tweet was just one in a string. His assertions essentially anticipated that an attack was coming, if not when and how. He also regularly referred to Weiner as a degenerate and liability to Clinton.â
âAll that was missing was a girl to lure Weiner into another âsextingâ transgression. Then the trap could be sprung and the computer contents publicized.â
All that was missing was the girl. But this part of the Great Coincidence was also being planned down in North Carolina by a young woman whose Right wing father had raised her to aspire to be the next Monica Lewinsky.Â
âToday, Anthony Weiner enters a federal prison hospital in Massachusetts to begin serving a 21-month sentence for his online relationship with an underage girl. Heâll be in an intensive counseling and treatment program.â
âOn its face, the final act of Weinerâs protracted and ugly fall seems straightforward â a sordid tale of a self-destructive middle-aged politicianâs exploitative cyber-relationship with a minor. And, make no mistake, that is much of the story.â
âBut close scrutiny reveals far more to it than meets the eye.â
Most Americans stopped at the tabloid headline: Weiner is a revolting pedophile. End of story. But thatâs precisely why heâs been the gift that keeps on giving for the GOP. The deeper truth is buried beneath layers of political manipulation.
đ§ The Trap Was Already Set
âAll that was missing was a girl to lure Weiner into another âsextingâ transgression. Then the trap could be sprung and the computer contents publicized.â
That girl was already being groomed as WhoWhatWhy documentedâby her father and by political operatives. Down in North Carolina, a teenager raised by a right-wing father reportedly aspired to be âthe next Monica Lewinsky.â And she wasnât alone.
đľď¸ââď¸ The Girl, the Father, and the Plan
âOur investigation turned up a fascinating cast of characters… beginning with a teenage girl in North Carolina sending fan messages to Congressman Weiner, and ending in one of the biggest electoral upsets in American history.â
The girlâs actions were shaped by adultsâher father and a Trump surrogate. She told at least two people she wanted to be âthe next Monica Lewinsky.â The goal wasnât just to entrap Weinerâit was to derail Hillary Clintonâs campaign.
Even WhoWhatWhy reporters faced threats and slammed doors when they tried to investigate her hometown. The silence was deafening.
Coincidences take a lot of planning. as Malcolm Nance says-Joyce Vance says âcoincidences donât really exist in law enforcementâ There is also FDRâs saying that there are no coincidences in politics.Â
At the very least it seems we should be skeptical of coincidences that seem too convenient.
âA thorough WhoWhatWhy investigation seems to suggest the latter. Our work has turned up a fascinating cast of characters, some with political connections, who were closely connected to a sequence of events that began with a teenage girl in North Carolina sending fan messages to Congressman Weiner, and ended in one of the biggest electoral upsets in American history. (We will only refer to her as âthe girlâ since she is still under 18 and the victim of a sex crime.)
FN: Although she and her father were happy to do public interviews. LinkâŚ
Exclusive: How Trump Backers Weaponized Anthony Weiner to Defeat Clinton
𧨠Chuck Johnsonâs Role
Chuck C. Johnson, the far-right provocateur who paid Sydney Leathers for dirt in 2016, reappears here.
âBack in May, we first reported that the âsextingâ episode resulting in Weinerâs arrest may have been driven in part by a deliberate effort to harm Clinton. We detailed the role of Trump sympathizers in making sure the story took hold and gained maximum attention, while also looking at ties to the law enforcement agencies that acted with surprising speed and vigor â a response which led to the discovery of Clintonâs emails on the computer used by Weiner and his wife, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.â
In the previous chapter we looked at the fact that Chuck Johnson had paid Sydney Leathers in 2016 for dirt on Weiner. Here we see his fingerprints emerge again at an even more insidious point.
âOne of these Trump allies was the notorious right-wing provocateur Chuck C. Johnson, who rated high enough in the new presidentâs firmament to snag a coveted invite to his super-secretive victory party. Multiple sources have informed WhoWhatWhy that Johnson and the girl communicated during the time she was sexting with Weiner. While the details of their conversations are murky, the very fact that the girl and Johnson communicated seems highly significant.â
So Johnson was paying for dirt on Weiner and he spoke to the then underage girl while she was sexting Weiner-prior to her and her father subsequently claiming she was the victim of Weinerâs sexts-despite her having solicited them. His role was more than simply passively hoping for such dirt-he proactively sought to manufacture it. The idea he spoke directly to the underage girl certainly does seem highly significant.
âJohnson is especially close to deep-pocketed fellow âright-wing populistâ Erik Prince, founder of the mercenary army formerly called Blackwater.â
FN: In chapter Leeden Manifesto we see that Prince partially funded Peter Smithâs Russian hacker scheme to get Clintonâs emails. We also see that in that chapter that Chuck Johnson himself sent the late Peter Smith a threatening email-apparently an attempt to extort the emails for him on behalf of Princeâs BFF Steve Bannon.
âRecently, the New York Times lent significant â if typically subtle and easily overlooked â credence to WhoWhatWhyâs early hypothesis that there was more to the story than Weinerâs illicit and disturbing conduct.â
Johnson wasnât just hoping for scandalâhe was manufacturing it. His ties to Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater and close ally of Steve Bannon, deepen the intrigue. Prince, as weâll explore in the Leeden Manifesto chapter, helped fund Peter Smithâs Russian hacker scheme to obtain Clintonâs emails.
𧨠The FBIâs October Surprise
The FBIâs decision to reopen the Clinton email investigationâbased on emails found on Weinerâs laptopâwas the final blow. It came just days before the election. And it was triggered by a case that began with a politically motivated sting.
âCoincidences take a lot of planning.â
As Malcolm Nance and Joyce Vance have said, law enforcement doesnât operate on coincidence. And as FDR put it: âIn politics, nothing happens by accident.â
đ§ The Girl Was Already in Motion
âAll that was missing was a girl to lure Weiner into another âsextingâ transgression. Then the trap could be sprung and the computer contents publicized.â
That girl was already being groomedâby her father and by political operatives. Down in North Carolina, a teenager raised by a right-wing father reportedly aspired to be âthe next Monica Lewinsky.â She initiated contact with Weiner, documented their exchanges, and sold her story to for $30,000âjust one day before her 16th birthday.
Coincidences take a lot of planning.
𧨠The Political Machinery Behind the Scandal
The MSM treated the scandal as manna from heaven, never asking where it came fromâjust reacting to the content. Itâs the same playbook used with Wikileaks. And itâs why Roger Stone and friends were able to take down Al Franken so easily. Itâs why Democrats demanded resignations from Virginiaâs top three officials based on stories from Big League Politics, a Breitbart-linked outlet run by Roy Mooreâs aides.
UPDATE: Add Katie Hill to the listâforced out over revenge porn from her abusive ex-husband. What a victory for #MeToo.
đľď¸ââď¸ The Girlâs Motives Exposed
Initially, the girl claimed to be mortified that she had damaged Clintonâs chances. She even said she was âupset with Comey.â But that was a ruse. She later told investigators that she hoped to:
- Influence the U.S. presidential election
- Secure personal profit
Check and check. Not bad for someone just shy of the age of consent.
âShe offered to âprove she had a vagina,â selectively took screenshots, and documented the exchanges before they disappeared.â
If she were an adult, sheâd be condemned like Don Segretti, Roger Stone, or Erik Prince. Instead, sheâs cast as a pure victim. But her actionsâsoliciting sexts to entrap Weiner and weaponize the scandalâsuggest complicity.
𧨠Chuck Johnson and Sydney Leathers Reappear
Chuck Johnson, who paid Sydney Leathers for Weiner dirt in 2016, also communicated directly with the underage girl during the sexting period. Thatâs not passive involvementâitâs active orchestration.
Sydney Leathers, who derailed Weinerâs 2013 mayoral run, was contacted by the girl in May 2016. Leathers told her to go to the police. The girl refused. Instead, Leathers advised her on how to cash in.
So during the months the girl was sexting Weiner:
- Her father was aware and encouraged it
- She spoke to Leathers (who had taken Weiner down before)
- She spoke to Johnson (who was paying Leathers for dirt)
This wasnât just a scandalâit was a coordinated operation.
đ§ž The Memo That Changed the Narrative
âUp until then, Weinerâs attorney, Arlo Devlin-Brown, himself had expressed no doubts at all about the media-consensus account of what happened â which painted the story as nothing more than a deviant Weiner taking advantage of a teenage girl.â
âThat changed on September 13. In a story mainly about Weinerâs remorse and struggle to avoid jail time, the paper quoted from a memo put together by Devlin-Brown â selecting comments that implicitly raised flags about the motivation behind the girlâs contacting Weiner in the first place.â
âThis is significant because, until then, the news media had given no consideration to larger forces being in play.â
But finally-arguably belatedly-Devlin-Brown submitted a sentencing memo that quietly shattered the media narrative. It revealed:
- The girl initiated contact
- She documented the exchanges for profit
- She sold her story to for $30,000
- She told investigators she wanted to influence the election
The memo also asked the court to investigate:
- Political motivations by the girl or her father
- Disclosures made to the Trump campaign or its surrogates
And the timing? The article ran one day before the girl turned 16âallowing them to legally describe her as 15.
âď¸ Legal and Moral Complexity
Weiner pled guilty. But guilty pleas donât always mean moral guilt. Sometimes theyâre strategic. Sometimes theyâre coerced by shame or bad legal advice.
âAnyone who presumes guilt solely because someone pled guilty needs to watch How to Get Away With Murder sometime.â
Weiner wasnât innocentâbut he was entrapped. The girl and her father wanted him to sext her. They succeeded. And the scandal they engineered helped take down Hillary Clinton.
âThe next day, the Times ran a piece which amplified Devlin-Brownâs questions about the girlâs motives and cyber-messaging behaviors. In it, the defense counselâs memo was quoted in detail, describing the girlâs highly sexualized attempts to get âAnthony to act outâ â beginning with her initial messages to him, which offered to âprove she had a vaginaâ â as well as her âselectively taking screenshots of her phone to document the exchanges before they disappeared.â
This is whatâs so complicated about this case. Because she was underage when this happened sheâs presumed to be a victim full stop. Yet her motivation is such that if she were an adult she could go to prison-she conspired through fraudulent means to effect the result of an election-the American Presidential election and she succeeded. If she were of age sheâd be publicly burned in effigy-I donât mean literally, of course, but her actions would be condemned just as those of Don Segretti, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, or Erik Prince. And I can buy that sheâs a victim of a sort but if so itâs of her right wing father who was very happy to use the money she raised to pay for his own gambling debts.
đ Footnotes
𧨠Coincidences Take Planning
As she and her father had in fact intended for Weiner to take the bait and start sexting, her version of events is false. The scandal wasnât spontaneousâit was engineered. And GOP operatives had been laying the groundwork to frame Weiner as a pedophile for years.
đľď¸ââď¸ The Prequel: 2011
Back in 2011, Breitbart and Mediaite ran stories claiming Weiner had been cyber-flirting with two teenage girls. The girlsââBetty and Veronicaââturned out to be fabricated personas, along with âBettyâsâ mom. Mediaite was forced to retract the story, despite the writerâs insistence that he had gone to âmore than reasonableâ lengths to confirm their identities.
This wasnât just sloppy journalismâit was a dry run. A test balloon for a future smear campaign.
đą The Postmodern Sex Addict
Weiner was a weak man with no self-control. He knew the New York Post was after him, but he couldnât stop. Heâs been attending sex addiction classes for yearsâbut his addiction is uniquely postmodern. Heâs a sex addict who never had sex. It was all virtual.
And yet, his virtual sex crimesâmany of which werenât even crimesâhave been punished far more harshly than the real sex crimes of Trump, Roy Moore, and perhaps even Brett Kavanaugh.
đ§ The Girlâs Story Doesnât Add Up
Coverage of Weinerâs relationship with the 15-year-old girl focused solely on him. It was lurid, voyeuristic, and framed as the final debasement of his self-destructive arc.
But the deeper story was ignored. Beginning in 2011, Weinerâs sexting scandals involved adult women. His lack of impulse control made him a prime target for Republican operatives looking to embarrass him, his wife Huma Abedin, and by extension, Hillary Clinton. the GOP had tried but until then failed to publicly tar him as a pedophile-as all his previous sexting partners had been over the age of consent.
So how did a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina become a âhuge fanâ of a disgraced congressman from New York who resigned when she was 10? And if she was so disgusted by his behavior, why did she continue communicating with him for six months?
đ° Motives, Models, and Media
Her fatherâs financial motives were well-documented. He declined to speak to WhoWhatWhy, but sources confirmed he dipped into the $30,000 payout from as soon as the check cleared.
Another partial answer lies in the influence of Sydney Leathersâa constant, contradictory media presence throughout the scandal. First contacted by the girl in May 2016, Leathers warned Weiner about the girlâs motives, alerted Child Protective Services (to no effect), and profited from setting up the interview.
Leathers later wondered aloud whether she had served as a model for the girlâs behavior. The girl also spoke to gossip blogger Nik Richie, who broke Leathersâ story in 2013.
âI donât know if she was just trying to do what I did or whatever,â Leathers said. âBut she went to Nik and he approached me.â
𧨠The Fallout
After the girl and her father sold the story, the ramifications exploded. By late October 2016, the scandal had spiraled into a renewed investigation of Clintonâs State Department emails. The probe was quickly closedâbut not before it gave Trump a surge in the polls just days before the election.
In a September 2017 piece on Weinerâs sentencing, The New York Times reminded readers that Clinton herself attributed her loss in part to the last-minute FBI investigation. She reasserts that point in her memoir.
đď¸ The Aftermath Weâre Still Living
And the rest is history. Or rather, counter-history. Weâre still living in the aftermathâa full-blown legitimacy crisis. The young girl and her father, working with Sydney Leathers, Chuck Johnson, , and others, created quite a âcoincidenceâ with all their planning.
It wasnât just a scandal. It was a political weapon. And it worked.
And that’s the worst part we continue to suffer the fallout to this day.