A sound and well-respected judicial sector linked to the police and corrections departments is a vital element in a country’s transition to sustainable peace. A strengthened justice sector will support reform of the police and corrections services. Thus, a national comprehensive security strategy recognizing the linkages between justice and security is necessary. Furthermore, foreign direct investment for development and commercial growth will prefer to operate in jurisdictions where the predictability and the integrity of the justice system are not in doubt.

While the focus may be on criminal justice, issues of civil justice (e.g. family and inheritance law, land reform and commercial law, as well as constitutional and administrative law) can be critical structural factors in reducing the incidence of crime and disorder. If civil disputes are not addressed, they can escalate into unrest or even violent conflict. If, however, citizens trust that the judicial system will not try and punish them arbitrarily, but will instead apply justice evenly and fairly, this also engenders trust in the host government and the entire justice system.

The international community should assess whether, with its comprehensive support, national counterparts would be willing and able to confront systemic threats to the judicial sector and thus to the rule of law. A mismatch between the degree of threat to judicial reform and the rule of law, and the authority and resources afforded the mission, is a prescription for failure. For example, it is not unusual for police reform to outpace judicial reform. This is unwise and negatively impacts all reforms.

The MLT is only one actor among those supporting judicial reform. The mission’s role as championing and supporting the national coordination of an overarching process will help add legitimacy and credibility to both the mission and the host government. Other international actors will remain engaged in judicial sector reform long after the peacekeeping mission has ended. The MLT may therefore find it useful to engage with them early on, in order to support and help coordinate all efforts. A strengthened judicial sector is a critical part of peacebuilding.

Based on the needs assessment and mapping, the MLT team will be aware of the many activities required to support judicial reform. As capacity building takes time, there may be pressure for rapid justice to meet public expectations. The MLT will have to consider which activities will avoid destabilizing the peace process while, at the same time, providing evidence of reform. The MLT will also need to strike a balance between initiating a judicial reform process that responds to the needs assessment and the host government’s capacity to absorb the reforms.

In meeting the requirement for rapid justice, the MLT may need to consider whether this requirement can be met using interim justice mechanisms or by supporting customary law, both of which can be extremely sensitive.

The expectations of the host country and the international community are likely to create tensions that the MLT will have to manage to avoid losing the support of either the host government or donors, whose long-term engagement is critical. Quick wins that demonstrate change might result in increased patience or tolerance that will provide the leverage needed to create sustainable judicial reform. The unintended consequence may be a quick win that does not meet the requirements for sustainable judicial reform in the longer term.

5.3.1 Operational activities

The key operational activities of the mission in support of this output include:

  • Conducting needs assessments and mapping existing judicial mechanisms, including traditional, customary and/or non-state mechanisms.
  • Promoting judicial and prosecutorial independence, professionalism, accountability and transparency through improved management and oversight.
  • Promoting effective enforcement of laws and equitable access to justice, including support for independent public defenders’ offices for the most excluded members of society.
  • Raising public awareness through information campaigns, ensuring that civil society perspectives are included, especially with regard to women and minorities.

5.3.2 Benchmarks

Short-term

  • Needs assessment and mapping completed.
  • Judges and all state officials in sector are paid.
  • Obstacles to reform identified.
  • Environment for judicial reform created.
  • Public information campaign planned and implemented.

Medium-term

  • Decrease in the number of people being detained illegally without a court appearance.
  • Vetting processes for prosecutors/defence lawyers, discipline and judicial appointment systems supported through secondments and international partnerships.
  • Budget and staffing requirements analysed.
  • Donors coordinated to minimize overlap.
  • Judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers and court administrators held accountable in transparent processes.
  • Increased access to, and use of, justice mechanisms, particularly for women and minorities, and increased representation of women in the judicial sector.

Long-term

  • The judiciary is independent and free from politicization of its financial affairs and the selection, promotion and disciplining of judges.
  • Judges, prosecutors and lawyers are held accountable for misconduct without any international involvement.
  • The legal profession adheres to rigorous standards of conduct.
  • The justice system performs essential criminal and civil law functions effectively.
  • Measures to protect human rights, such as a human rights commission or ombudsman, are effective.

5.3.3 Responsibilities and coordination

The host government retains the lead role in ensuring that a strengthened judicial sector enforces the legal codes developed by the legislative body. Within the mission, the MLT is responsible for balancing local ownership of the judicial sector against the goals of the mission. In most instances, the MLT can support the strengthening of a judicial sector by providing political leadership and facilitating the coordination of long-term donor support. By championing and coordinating, the MLT can help create a political environment in which judicial reform can prevail over time.

A major factor in supporting the creation of legitimacy and credibility in the judicial sector is mitigating the risks inherent in the timeframe for achieving the mandated tasks related to judicial reform, while not jeopardizing the local ownership of and public support for judicial reform. Linking with women’s and minority groups that advocate on behalf of equitable access to justice and overall judicial reform will also be a critical area for coordination.

5.3.4 Resources

Sufficient resources and expertise should be allocated to support the strengthening of the judicial sector. Key national experts with knowledge, skills and abilities, and international expertise in the relationship between culture, context, law and balancing what is possible in the given circumstance will be important for mentoring and supporting judicial reform. Personnel will be needed within the mission with experience and expertise in political, legal and human rights mentoring and advice. The long-term nature of judicial reform requires sustained donor assistance.

5.3.5 Challenges and risks

  • The potential clash between national and international norms on judicial reform.
  • A shattered or non-existent formal legal system lacks sufficient actors to undertake the breadth of measures required.
  • A weak civil society is unable to contribute to judicial reform, which limits judicial legitimacy and credibility.
  • Organized crime and corruption with ties to political power influence reform of the judicial sector.
  • The logistical and resource challenges of undertaking large- scale changes to court administration and management.
  • Weak national management and/or leadership culture.
  • Integration of marginalized and vulnerable groups is challenged.

5.3.6 Considerations

Balancing political stability against the accountability of judicial sector

Political and criminal influence over the judicial sector is an obstacle to the rule of law. However, tackling this may have political consequences that could destabilize the peace process. In times of conflict, a variety of interests (e.g. legal, political and economic) are often implicated in criminal activity, which can have an effect on post-conflict recovery and judicial reform. The hasty removal of judges, for example, can create a vacuum in power structures, which may have a longer-term negative impact on strengthening judicial reform.

Balancing results and time

Judicial reform is a long-term process without a fixed end date. The need for results on the part of the mission and the donor community should be balanced against the time and local skills required to build judicial reform that is responsive to culture, context and capacity.

The absence of a strong professional legal community (i.e. judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers, court managers) results in undue reliance on international experts who are not likely to be engaged in the long-term development of a judicial core that can implement the judicial reform processes. At the same time, the short-term expedient use of international expertise may help prevent detention for extended periods while local expertise is developed.

Addressing entrenched corruption while supporting judicial reform

There are often ties between organized crime and corruption, especially when the host government has not paid judges and other staff employed in the judicial sector. Corrupt practices often become the standard means through which the population gains access to justice. If this practice is generally accepted, there are likely to be fewer incentives for – and greater resistance to – reform of the judicial sector. For the host country, there is often substantial resistance to changing institutionalized corruption.

Supporting local or international norms

Strongly developed traditional forms of justice, which have met the needs of the local population, often exist in a post-conflict environment. These sometimes fail to adhere to international norms, especially with regard to women and minorities. There is likely to be a need to balance cultural norms (expediency) against international norms (standards). Customary dispute resolution, whether formal or informal, should be acknowledged and brought into the overall strategic consideration of judicial reform Furthermore, cultural norms should not be used to entrench violations of human rights, especially with regard to women and minorities.

License

Considerations for Mission Leadership in United Nations Peace Operations Copyright © 2021 by International Forum for the Challenges of Peace Operations. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book