Once the need for emergency assistance has subsided and early recovery is in progress, the focus should be on a smooth transition to longer-term development activities. This will entail gradual handover of responsibilities to national authorities. The transition from peacekeeping to subsequent phases of UN engagement should be factored in from the outset of the mission planning process, in order to clearly delineate the roles and responsibilities of the various UN actors on the ground. Ideally, planning for the transition from emergency and early recovery to long-term rehabilitation and development should begin early in the peacekeeping and peacebuilding phase. It is important at the outset to help national authorities implement a holistic approach that brings together all the relevant branches of government. Only national actors are in a position to meet their country’s needs and objectives in a sustainable manner.

Clearly identified benchmarks will make it easier to plan the exit strategy of the peace operation. In other words, the successful transition from recovery to development and the ability of national and other institutions to take responsibility in a number of areas will be defining factors in the drawdown of a mission. Key elements of transition, such as socio-economic recovery, are rarely among the mandated tasks of a peacekeeping mission. This makes a holistic and integrated UN approach essential. Peace operations must also support a number of essential activities that contribute to the consolidation of peace, such as the restoration of basic services and the revitalization of the economy.

6.6.1 Operational activities

The key operational activities by the mission to support this output include:

  • Completing the DDR process.
  • Ensuring the ability of national armed forces, police and other law- enforcement agencies to provide security and maintain public order.
  • Monitoring the restoration of state authority and the resumption of basic services.
  • Overseeing the consolidation of legitimate political institutions and democratic processes.
  • Benchmarking and achieving consensus on the criteria for successful transition in coordination with the UNCT.
  • Developing transition plans in all relevant areas in coordination with the UNCT.

6.6.2 Benchmarks

Short-term

  • Security situation stabilized.
  • Host government generally considered legitimate and enjoys public support.
  • Disarmament and demobilization completed, and focus shifted to reintegration of former combatants.
  • Public participation in development visible.
  • Public expectations for development managed.

Medium-term

  • The state has a monopoly on the legitimate use of force.
  • Human rights violations are decreasing.
  • The demands and needs of the victims of the conflict have been largely met.
  • Reconciliation and transitional justice efforts are underway.
  • Legitimate institutions of government have been established.
  • Capacity-building efforts, including at the local level, are underway.
  • A long-term development plan is in place.

Long-term

  • Disputes are settled peacefully and within well-established and functioning political institutions and mechanisms.
  • The rule of law has been fully (re-)established.
  • General security levels and the economic climate are both conducive to foreign investment, encouraging participation by all economic actors, including local actors.
  • Secure banking and credit structures and monetary policy are established, and inflation rate is controlled.
  • Individuals and enterprises have access to loans and/or investment capital.

6.6.3 Responsibilities and coordination

A host of UN and external partners play lead roles in emergency assistance, early recovery and development, but the interface and involvement of a peacekeeping mission in all these efforts require close coordination with all the relevant actors, from the initial planning stage to the final handover of responsibilities. While the entire MLT should be actively involved in this regard, the role of the DSRSG-RC/HC is particularly important. Benchmarks should be formulated in close coordination with the national authorities, donor governments, and local and international NGOs. These should be based on the development of local capabilities rather than progress with mandate implementation. Careful cooperation and coordination between the mission and UNHQ, including the PBSO, will be necessary in determining possible follow-on arrangements to the peacekeeping mission.

6.6.4 Resources

From a resource perspective, most recovery and development efforts are outside of the purview of the peacekeeping mission. However, the mission should have adequate civilian human resources throughout its deployment, including during the process of downsizing/liquidation, to be able to efficiently undertake all liaison and coordination activities with relevant partners. Since many recovery and development activities are funded from voluntary contributions, the MLT, especially the SRSG and the DSRSG-RC/HC, will play an important role in coordinating UN efforts, and mobilizing donor support and the engagement of key international players such as the World Bank, the IMF, the EU and regional financial institutions.

6.6.5 Challenges and risks

  • The peace operation is withdrawn prematurely leaving the structural causes of the conflict unaddressed, with the potential to affect long-term development.
  • National authorities and local institutions do not yet have the capacity to take over from the mission and/or UNCT.
  • Donor fatigue leads to disengagement and under-funding of recovery programmes.
  • Donor focus is diverted to other emerging international crises.
  • There is a lack of funds for peace consolidation and development activities, such as for the reintegration of former combatants.
  • There is a lack of coordination between peacekeeping mission and follow-on operations and/or entities.
  • There is a lack of thorough analysis of or consideration given to the needs of women or perceptions of their security.

6.6.6 Considerations

Premature withdrawal versus over-dependence on the peacekeeping mission

Resource pressure may compel the UN Security Council and the wider international community to push for the termination or downsizing of a peacekeeping mission earlier than recommended or desired by the UN Secretariat. Pressure to withdraw may also come from the host government. On the one hand, premature withdrawal could have disastrous consequences from a political, security and financial perspective. On the other hand, the extended presence of a mission may lead to overdependence or inhibit the development of national capacities. Capacity development should start as early as possible rather than being seen only in the context of an international exit strategy.

Maintaining external support while preparing for withdrawal

International attention is greatest in the immediate aftermath of a conflict, generally defined as the first two years after the main conflict has ended. Transitions may be a sign of successful peace consolidation; but they are also highly sensitive periods. National authorities may have concerns that the departure of the peacekeeping mission will have unintended impacts or coincide with a huge drop in external political and financial support. The HoM and MLT should actively encourage international actors to continue their engagement after the withdrawal of the mission. The prospects for a responsible exit would be improved in each case, and overall costs reduced, by three sets of commitments by the international community: (a) enhanced economic support; (b) political oversight, perhaps through new Peacebuilding Commission country-specific mechanisms; and (c) security guarantees.

License

Considerations for Mission Leadership in United Nations Peace Operations Copyright © 2021 by International Forum for the Challenges of Peace Operations. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book