DexTrade P2P: Cost-Effective for Crypto Swaps

Fees and Costs: DexTrade P2P is designed to be low-cost for users. The platform charges no explicit trading fee or service fee on crypto-to-crypto swaps; users only pay the network transaction fees required to execute the swap on-chain . (For example, the Bitcoin and Ethereum miner/gas fees for an atomic swap transaction.) This is a major differentiator, as many DEXs and exchanges rely on fee revenue. On DexTrade, if one is doing a fiat-to-crypto trade through the marketplace, an independent exchanger might set a markup or fee, but that is transparently shown and not taken by the platform . By contrast, Uniswap (and most AMM DEXs) incorporate a liquidity provider fee on each swap – typically 0.3% of the trade on Uniswap v2 pools, with Uniswap v3 offering tiers like 0.05%, 0.30%, or 1% depending on the pool’s risk profile . This fee is deducted from the trade as slippage and awarded to liquidity providers. Traders on Uniswap also pay gas fees to interact with the smart contract, which on Ethereum can be significant (though on Layer-2 versions the gas is lower). ThorSwap’s fee structure involves two parts: liquidity pool fees and network fees. Each ThorChain swap charges a dynamic fee that depends on pool depth and network conditions (to compensate liquidity providers, similar to an AMM fee) .

Because a cross-chain swap on ThorChain actually executes two swaps (Asset A -> RUNE, then RUNE -> Asset B), the user effectively pays fees twice, one for each pool, plus the transaction fees on the respective networks. ThorChain also has slip-based fees to discourage draining the pools – large trades incur higher slippage costs. In practice, ThorSwap users might see a few tenths of a percent in price spread plus some fixed outbound fee. The bottom line: DexTrade’s atomic swaps avoid platform fees altogether, potentially giving better rates if a good peer offer is available. Uniswap’s fixed percentage fee can make large trades costly (0.3% of a large notional is significant), though deep liquidity can minimize price impact beyond that fee. ThorChain’s cross-chain convenience comes at the cost of multiple fee layers (though for many users it’s worth it to avoid centralized exchanges). For frequent traders, DexTrade no-fee model (aside from blockchain costs) is very appealing, whereas liquidity providers on other DEXs expect compensation via those trading fees. It’s worth noting that DexTrade likely will have spreads between buy and sell offers – market makers might bake profit into the offer price – but those are market-driven, not a protocol fee.

Conclusion:

DexTrade P2P offers a uniquely low-cost trading experience by eliminating platform fees on crypto-to-crypto swaps, requiring users to pay only standard blockchain transaction fees. In contrast, Uniswap and ThorSwap impose liquidity provider fees and network costs that can add up, especially for large or cross-chain trades. While DexTrade’s model depends on peer-to-peer offers, making price spreads market-driven, it presents a compelling option for traders seeking a fee-minimized, decentralized trading experience.