Learning Goals

 By the end of this reading, you should be able to:

  • Discuss the predator-prey cycle
  • Give examples of defenses against predation and herbivory
  • Describe the competitive exclusion principle
  • Give examples of symbiotic relationships between species
  • Explain how species interactions can play a role in the adaptation and evolution of species

Introduction

Populations rarely, if ever, live in isolation from populations of other species. In most cases, numerous species share a habitat. The interactions between these populations play a major role in regulating population growth and abundance. All populations occupying the same habitat form a community: populations inhabiting a specific area at the same time. The number of species occupying the same habitat and their relative abundance is known as species diversity. Areas with low diversity, such as the glaciers of Antarctica, still contain a wide variety of living things, whereas the diversity of tropical rainforests is so great that it cannot be counted. Ecology is studied at the community level to understand how species interact with each other and compete for the same resources.

Predation and Herbivory

 Perhaps the classical example of species interaction is predation: the consumption of prey by its predator. While we usually think of animals hunting other animals, herbivory, in which plants are eaten by animals is also a form of predation. The predator-prey relationship is considered to be an antagonist one, where one species has a negative impact on the other species. Within a community the sizes of the populations of predators and prey are often not constant over time: in most cases, the respective populations’ sizes will vary in cycles that appear to be related.

Lynx and Snowshoe hares.jpg
Figure 1. The cycling of lynx and snowshoe hare populations in Northern Ontario is an example of predator-prey dynamics.

The most often cited example of predator-prey dynamics is seen in the cycling of the lynx (predator) and the snowshoe hare (prey), using nearly 200-year-old trapping data from North American forests.  This cycle of predator and prey lasts approximately 10 years, with the predator population lagging 1–2 years behind that of the prey population. As the hare numbers increase, there is more food available for the lynx, allowing the lynx population to increase as well. When the lynx population grows to a threshold level, however, they kill so many hares that the hare population begins to decline, followed by a decline in the lynx population because of the scarcity of food. When the lynx population is low, the hare population size begins to increase due, at least in part, to low predation pressure, starting the cycle anew.

Some researchers question the idea that predation models entirely control the population cycling of the two species. More recent studies have pointed to undefined density-dependent factors as being important in cycling, in addition to predation. One possibility is that the cycling is inherent in the hare population due to density-dependent effects such as lower fecundity (maternal stress)  caused by crowding when the hare population gets too dense. The hare cycling would then induce the cycling of the lynx because it is the lynxes’ major food source. The more we study communities, the more complexities we find, allowing ecologists to derive more accurate and sophisticated models of population dynamics.

Review Question:

Quick Review: Causes of Cycling
In addition to the negative impact of predation, what other factors might be causing cycling in a prey population?
A) changes in fecundity
B) alterations in environmental conditions
C) density-dependent increases in disease

Defense Mechanisms against Predation and Herbivory

The study of communities must consider evolutionary forces that act on the members of the various populations contained within it. Species are not static, but slowly changing and adapting to their environment by natural selection and other evolutionary forces. Species have evolved numerous mechanisms to escape predation and herbivory. These defenses may be mechanical, chemical,  physical, or behavioral.

Mechanical defenses, such as the presence of thorns on plants or the hard shell on turtles, discourage animal predation and herbivory by causing physical pain to the predator or by physically preventing the predator from being able to eat the prey.  Chemical defenses are produced by many animals as well as plants, such as the foxglove which is extremely toxic when eaten.

Defenses against predation.jpg
Figure 2. credit a: modification of work by Huw Williams; credit b: modification of work by “JamieS93”/Flickr; credit c: modification of work by Philip Jägenstedt; credit d: modification of work by Cory Zanker

The (a) honey locust tree (Gleditsia triacanthos) uses thorns, a mechanical defense, against herbivores, while the (b) Florida red-bellied turtle (Pseudemys nelsoni) uses its shell as a mechanical defense against predators. (c) Foxglove (Digitalis sp.)  uses a chemical defense: toxins produced by the plant can cause nausea,  vomiting, hallucinations, convulsions, or death when consumed. (d) The  North American millipede (Narceus americanus)  uses both mechanical and chemical defenses: when threatened, the millipede curls into a defensive ball and produces a noxious substance that irritates eyes and skin.

Camouflage.jpg
Figure 3. credit a: modification of work by Linda Tanner; credit b: modification of work by Frank Vassen

Other species use their body shape and coloration to avoid being detected by predators. The tropical walking stick is an insect with the coloration and body shape of a twig  (a) which makes it very hard to see when stationary against a background of real twigs. In another example, the chameleon can change its color to match its surroundings (b). Both of these are examples of camouflage or avoiding detection by blending in with the background.

The use of specific coloration as a way of warning predators to avoid eating them can be found in some species of organisms. For example, the cinnabar moth caterpillar, the fire-bellied toad, and many species of beetle have bright colors that warn of a foul taste, the presence of toxic chemicals, and/or the ability to sting or bite, respectively. Predators that ignore this coloration and eat the organisms will experience their unpleasant taste or presence of toxic chemicals and learn not to eat them in the future. This type of defensive mechanism is called aposematic coloration, or warning coloration.

Aposematic coloration.jpg
Figure 4. credit a: modification of work by Jay Iwasaki; credit b: modification of work by Dan Dzurisin

The strawberry poison dart frog (Oophaga pumilio) uses aposematic coloration to warn predators that it is toxic, while the (b) striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis) uses aposematic coloration to warn predators of the unpleasant odor it produces.

While some predators learn to avoid eating certain potential prey because of their coloration, other species have evolved mechanisms to mimic this coloration to avoid being eaten, even though they themselves may not be unpleasant to eat or contain toxic chemicals. In Batesian mimicry,  a harmless species imitates the warning coloration of a harmful one.  Assuming they share the same predators, this coloration then protects the harmless ones, even though they do not have the same level of physical or chemical defenses against predation as the organism they mimic. Many insect species mimic the coloration of wasps or bees, which are stinging, venomous insects, thereby discouraging predation.

Batesian mimicry.jpg
Figure 5. Batesian mimicry occurs when a harmless species mimics the coloration of a harmful species, as is seen with the (a) bumblebee and (b) bee-like robber fly. (credit a, b: modification of work by Cory Zanker)

In Müllerian mimicry, multiple species share the same warning coloration, but all of them actually have defenses.  This means that they mimic each other in some way creating a larger grouping and thus can be more easily recognized by potential predators.

Mullerian mimicry.jpg
Figure 6. Several unpleasant-tasting Heliconius butterfly species share a similar color pattern with better-tasting varieties, an example of Müllerian mimicry. (credit: Joron M, Papa R, Beltrán M, Chamberlain N, Mavárez J, et al.)

In Emsleyan/Mertensian mimicry,  a deadly prey mimics a less dangerous one, such as the venomous coral snake mimicking the nonvenomous milk snake. This type of mimicry is extremely rare and more difficult to understand than the previous two types. For this type of mimicry to work, it is essential that eating the milk snake has unpleasant but not fatal consequences. Then, these predators learn not to eat snakes with this coloration, protecting the coral snake as well. If the snake were fatal to the predator, there would be no opportunity for the predator to learn not to eat it, and the benefit for the less toxic species would disappear.

Review Question:

Quick Review: Mimcry

In mimicry, all of the species have some type of harmful toxin.
In mimicry, a toxic species mimics a non-toxic or less toxic species
In a non-toxic/not dangerous species mimics a more toxic/dangerous species

Competitive Exclusion Principle

Resources are often limited within a habitat and multiple species may compete to obtain them. All species have an ecological niche in the ecosystem, which describes how they acquire the resources they need and how they interact with other species in the community. The competitive exclusion principle states that two species cannot occupy the same niche in a habitat. In other words, different species cannot coexist in a community if they are competing for all the same resources. An example of this principle can be seen with two protozoan species, Paramecium aurelia and Paramecium caudatum.

Competitive Exclusion Principle.jpg
Figure 7. Paramecium aurelia and Paramecium caudatum grow well individually, but when they compete for the same resources, the P. aurelia outcompetes the P. caudatum.

When grown individually in the laboratory, they both thrive. But when they are placed together in the same test tube (habitat), P. aurelia outcompetes P. caudatum for food, leading to the latter’s eventual extinction.  This exclusion may be avoided if a population evolves to make use of a  different resource, a different area of the habitat, or feeds during a different time of day, called resource partitioning. The two organisms are then said to occupy different microniches. These organisms coexist by minimizing direct competition.

Review Question:

Quick Review: Competitive Exclusion
A) one species will outcompete the other
B) both species will be able to coexist but at lower population sizes
C) resource partitioning between the two species may evolve
D) one of the species may become locally extinct

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships, or symbioses  (plural), are close interactions between individuals of different species over an extended period of time that impact the abundance and distribution of the associating populations. Most scientists accept this definition, but some restrict the term to only those species that are mutualistic, where both individuals benefit from the interaction. In this discussion, the broader definition will be used.

Commensalism

A commensal relationship occurs when one species benefits from the close, prolonged interaction, while the other neither benefits nor is harmed. Birds nesting in trees provides an example of a commensal relationship.

Commensalism.jpg
Figure 8.

Typically the tree is not harmed by the presence of the nest among its branches. The nests are light and produce little strain on the structural integrity of the branch, and most of the leaves, which the tree uses to get energy by photosynthesis, are above the nest so they are unaffected. The bird, on the other hand, benefits greatly. If the bird had to nest in the open, its eggs and young would be vulnerable to predators.  Another example of a commensal relationship is the clownfish and the sea anemone. The sea anemone is not harmed by the fish and the fish benefits from protection from predators who would be stung upon nearing the sea anemone.

Mutualism

The second type of symbiotic relationship is called mutualism,  where two species benefit from their interaction.  For example,  termites have a mutualistic relationship with protozoa that live in the insect’s gut (a).  The termite benefits from the ability of bacterial symbionts within the protozoa to digest cellulose. The termite itself cannot do this, and without the protozoa, it would not be able to obtain energy from its food (cellulose from the wood it chews and eats). The protozoa and the bacterial symbionts benefit by having a protective environment and a  constant supply of food from the wood chewing actions of the termite.  Lichens have a mutualistic relationship between fungus and photosynthetic algae or bacteria (b).  As these symbionts grow together, the glucose produced by the algae provides nourishment for both organisms, whereas the physical structure of the lichen protects the algae from the elements and makes certain nutrients in the atmosphere more available to the algae.

Mutualism.jpg
Figure 9. credit a: modification of work by Scott Bauer, USDA; credit b: modification of work by Cory Zanker

Parasitism

A parasite is an organism that lives in or on another living organism and derives nutrients from it. In this relationship, the parasite benefits, but the host is harmed. The host is usually weakened by the parasite as it siphons resources the host would normally use to maintain itself. The parasite,  however, is unlikely to kill the host, especially not quickly, because this would allow no time for the organism to complete its reproductive cycle by spreading to another host.

The reproductive cycles of parasites are often very complex, sometimes requiring more than one host species. A tapeworm is a parasite that causes disease in humans when contaminated,  undercooked meat is consumed. d\The tapeworm can live inside the intestine of the host for several years, benefiting from the food the host is eating and may grow to be over 50 ft long by adding segments. The parasite moves from species to species in a cycle, making two hosts necessary to complete its life cycle.

Another common parasite is Plasmodium falciparum,  the protozoan cause of malaria, a significant disease in many parts of the world. Living in the human liver and red blood cells, the organism reproduces asexually in the gut of blood-feeding mosquitoes to complete its life cycle. Thus malaria is spread from human to human by mosquitoes, one of many arthropod-borne infectious diseases.

Summary

Communities include all the different species living in a given area.  The variety of these species is called species richness. Many organisms have developed defenses against predation and herbivory, including mechanical defenses, warning coloration, and mimicry, as a result of evolution and the interaction with other members of the community. Two species cannot exist in the same habitat competing directly for the same resources. Species may form symbiotic relationships such as commensalism or mutualism.

End of Section Review Questions:

REVIEW: Mimicry
A) Batesian mimicry
B) Müllerian mimicry
C) Emsleyan/Mertensian mimicry
D) Mertensian mimicry

REVIEW: Competition

A) two species occupy the same area
B) two species utilize the same resource(s)
C) one species preys upon the other species
D) one species mimics the defensive coloration of the other

Thinking about it

3) Why might it take 1-2 reproductive cycles (or even years) before a predator population size changes as a result of a downsizing of the prey population?

Thinking about it

4) Each of the types of interspecific interactions can result in changes in both populations. Explain the potential evolutionary impacts of interspecific interactions.
definition

License

Icon for the CC0 (Creative Commons Zero) license

To the extent possible under law, s2jrmoor has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to VCU BIOL 152: Introduction to Biological Sciences II, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book