Barriers To Self Advocacy for Students with Learning Disabilities in the K12 Education System
Matthew Cote
Overview
This chapter is presented in video format and explores the barriers that students with learning disabilities face within the K12 education system in Ontario. The chapter presents case studies of students’ lived experiences with self-advocacy efforts and the barriers they encountered throughout their experiences. This chapter provides educators with some next steps to reflect on how to address these barriers within their classrooms.
Introduction
The introduction emphasizes the significance of self-advocacy for individuals with learning disabilities within the K-12 education system. This video serves as an introduction to the chapter and defines key terms such as learning disabilities, barriers, and self-advocacy. The introduction concludes by highlighting key barriers to self-advocacy for students, identifying a variety of potential barriers that could impact a student’s development of self-advocacy skills.
Case Studies
Case Study 1: My Experience in Grade 9
This video introduces the format of the case studies we will be exploring in this chapter, as well as goes through case number 1, which explores my experience as a person with a learning disability in my grade 9 English course. It also explores what barriers existed that impacted my self-advocacy in this experience.
Case Study 2: My Experience in Grade 10
This case study explores my experiences as a student in grade 10, and explores what barriers existed that impacted my experience in self-advocacy at this time.
Case Study 3: My Experiences in Grade 11
This case study explores my experiences as a student in grade 11, and explores what barriers existed that impacted my experience in self-advocacy at this time.
Breaking Down Barriers
This section of the chapter looks at understanding how educators can make efforts to dismantle barriers for advocacy within the educational spaces they facilitate. This section looks to apply theories such as the TPACK model, intersectionality, and Universal design as tools to support educators in dismantling barriers for self-advocacy in their classrooms. This section ends with actionable steps educators can take.
Full Presentation
This is a full 41-minute recording of the chapter that contains all sections above in one long-form video. Sections are broken up across the video.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bešić, E. (2020). Intersectionality: A pathway towards inclusive education? Prospects, 49(1–2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09461-6
Bruce, C., & Aylward, M. L. (2021). Disability and self-advocacy experiences in university learning contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 23(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.741
Canva. (2025). [AI-generated image of Accessibility Barriers]. Canva AI. https://www.canva.com
Canva. (2025). [AI-generated image of Important Idea. Canva AI. https://www.canva.com
Canva. (2025). [AI-generated image of Megaphone]. Canva AI. https://www.canva.com
Canva. (2025). [AI-generated image of Three books side by side titled grade 9, grade 10, and grade 11. Canva AI. https://www.canva.com
CAST (2024). Universal design for learning guidelines version 3.0 [graphic organizer]. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Jackson, R. (1999). Learning disability and advocacy: Obstacles to client empowerment. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 50–55.
Koca, D. B., Sart, Z. H., Sakız, H., & Albayrak-Kaymak, D. (2023). Self-advocacy experiences of students with specific learning disabilities. Social Psychology of Education, 26(3), 709–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09771-5
Lock, R. H., & Layton, C. A. (2001). Succeeding in postsecondary education through self-advocacy. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(2), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990103400210
Lamond, B., Mo, S., & Cunningham, T. (2023). Teachers’ perceived usefulness of assistive technology in Ontario classrooms. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 17(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-05-2022-0040
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014, August 26). Policy/Program Memorandum No. 8: Identification of and program planning for students with learning disabilities. https://www.ontario.ca/document/education-ontario-policy-and-program-direction/policyprogram-memorandum-8
OpenAI. (2025). An image of a high school student telling their science teacher they’re worried about how they are doing in the class, but the teacher tells them they are doing okay, [AI-generated image]. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com/
OpenAI. (2025). An image of a student asking for accommodations and a teacher giving an excuse as to why they cannot provide them. [AI-generated image]. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com/
OpenAI. (2025). An Image of a student in a classroom alone at a desk working on a computer, the student should have headphones on, and look defeated. [AI-generated image]. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com/
Pfeifer, M. A., Reiter, E. M., Cordero, J. J., & Stanton, J. D. (2021). Inside and out: Factors that support and hinder the self-advocacy of undergraduates with ADHD and/or specific learning disabilities in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), ar17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0107
Sniatecki, J. L., Pelz, J. A., & Gates, T. G. (2018). Human rights advocacy for students with disabilities: Challenging stigma and promoting opportunity in social work education. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 3(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-018-0058-3
The Intersection Onion, Edvina Bešić, 2020, JPG,Intersectionality: A pathway towards inclusive education? Prospects, 49(1–2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09461-6
TPACK.ORG (2012). TPACK Framework [image] https://tpack.org/tpack-image/