References
ACRL Board of Directors. (2011, October). ACRL Visual Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy
Ahn, JN, Hu, D, Vega, M. (2020). Do as I do, not as I say. Using social learning theory to unpack the impact of role models on students’ outcomes in education. Social and Personal Psychology Compass, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12517
Akçayır, M., Dündar, H., & Akçayır, G. (2019). What makes you a better learner? Augmented reality reflections. Computers & Education, 137, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.011
Alrashidi, M., Almohammadi, K., Gardner, M., & Callaghan, V. (2017). Making the invisible visible: real-time feedback for embedded computing learning activity using a pedagogical virtual machine with augmented reality. In L. T. De Paolis, P. Bourdot, & A. Mongelli (Eds.), Augmented reality, virtual reality, and computer graphics. AVR 2017. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 10324 (pp. 339–355). Springer international publishing
Alshamrani Alshaikhi, & Joy, M. (2021). Using Augmented Reality in Computing Higher Education. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 12677, pp. 526–530). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_58
Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
Association of College and Research Libraries (2022). ACRL Visual Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34– 47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1174807.pdf
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Kinshuk, S. (2018). Insights into the factors influencing student’s motivation in Augmented reality learning experiences in vocational education and training. Frontier in Psychology, 9, 1486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01486
Baker, D. J., & Zuvela, D. (2013). Feedforward strategies in the first-year experience of online and distributed learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6),687–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691153
Balta, N., Michinov, N., Balyimez, S., & Ayaz, M. F. (2017). A meta-analysis of the effect of peer instruction on learning gain: Identification of informational and cultural moderators. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.009
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Baragash, R., Al-samarrie, H., Azahrai, A., & Alfarraj, O. (2020). Augmented reality in special education; A meta-analysis of single-subject design studies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 382-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1703548
Billinghurst, M. (2021). Grand Challenges for Augmented Reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2:578080. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.578080
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426.
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2014). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042565
Bowen Mendoza, L., Pinargote Ortega, M., Meza Hormaza, J., and Ventura Soto S. (2020). Trends the use of Artificial Intelligence techniques for peer assessment. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering & MIS 2020 (ICEMIS’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 101, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410352.3410837
Bunting, Bryce D., Editorial: The Anatomy of High-Impact Peer Learning Experiences, Journal of Peer Learning, 13, 2020, 1-4. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol13/iss1/1
Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903477102
Chan, Hafiz, M., Kwong, T., & Wong, E. Y. W. (2021). Reinforcing the Importance of Academic Integrity and Ethics (AIE) Through Augmented Reality (AR) Learning Trails. In Blended Learning for Inclusive and Quality Higher Education in Asia (pp. 65–85). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4106-7_4
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). SAGE.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
Charmaz, K. (2008). The Legacy of Anselm Strauss for Constructivist Grounded Theory. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction. Emerald Publishing Group.
Chen, X., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. (2018). Adaptive Augmented Reality for Personalized Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0254-8
Chen, X., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. (2020). AI-Enabled Data Visualization for Enhanced Learning Experiences. Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00428-5
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. Little, Brown and Company.
Cofer, R. McBrayer, J-S. Zinskie, C., Wells, P., and Fallon, K. (2022) Perceived Gains of Peer Educators in Campus Learning Centers: Academic Performance and Learning, Non-Academic Skillsets, and Self-Confidence and Fulfillment, Journal of Peer Learning, 15(1), 17-31. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol15/iss1/3
Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1982). Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002237
Connell, R. (2019). The good university: What universities actually do and why it’s time for radical change. Monash University Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-06-2019-070
Cottam, H. (2019). Radical help: How we can remake the relationships between us and revolutionise the welfare state. Little Brown. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1798169
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J.W. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE.
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. SAGE.
CRPD (Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities). (2016). General comment No. 4 (2016) on the right to inclusive education. CRPD/C/GC/4. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CRPD/GC/RighttoEducation/CRPD-C-GC-4.doc
Darvishi, A., Khosravi,H., Abdi,S., Sadiq, S., and Gašević,D.(2022). Incorporating Training, Self-monitoring and AI-Assistance to Improve Peer Feedback Quality. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491140.3528265
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE.
Donald, W. E., and D. Jackson. (2022). Subjective Wellbeing among University Students and Recent Graduates: Evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11): 6911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116911
Donald, W.E. & Ford, N. (2023) Fostering social mobility and employability: the case for peer learning, Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 672-678, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2145467
Downes, S. (2022). Connectivism. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1). http://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/623
Dukalskaya, I.V & Tabueva, I.N (2022). Promoting Augmented Reality Technology in Teaching the English Language to Non-Linguistic Students in Higher Education. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.1.47
Dweck, C. & Yeager, D. (2021, August 25 ). Global Mindset Initiative Introduction: Envisioning the Future of Growth Mindset Research in Education. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911564
Elfeky, A. I. M. & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2021). Developing skills in fashion design by augmented reality technology in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1558259
Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2019). The education ecology of universities: integrating learning, strategy, and the academy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351135863
Ens, Lanir, J., Tang, A., Bateman, S., Lee, G., Piumsomboon, T., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Revisiting collaboration through mixed reality: The evolution of groupware. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.011
Eyre, J. (2015) Institutional Management of Peer-Led Learning: A Framework for Holistic Integration. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i0.357
Ferreira, M. J., Moreira, F. & Escudero, D. F. (2019). Gamification in higher education: The learning perspective. In B. D. D. Silva et al. (Eds). Experiences and perceptions of pedagogical practices with game-based learning & gamification. Research Centre on Education (CIEd), Institute of Education, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal (pp. 195-218). http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3451
Fiksdal Kallestad, A. & Lande, M. (2022). Use of Augmented Reality to Enhance Learning and Collaboration for Students in Neuroscience. Norwegian University of Sciences and Technology: Trondheim. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3024694
Frank, R. (2020). An interview. Economist. https://www.economist.com/open-future/2020/02/07/we-can-harness-peer-pressure-to-uphold-social-values
Frank, R. H. (2020). Should Regulators Ignore Behavioral Contagion? In Under the Influence: Putting Peer Pressure to Work. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1nxcvb4.14
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th Ed.). Pearson Education.
Garcia-Melgar, A., East, J. and Meyers, N. (2015). Hiding in plain sight: the’ relationship’ in peer-assisted learning in higher education. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i0.361
Garzón, J., Kinshuk, Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334
Geroimenko, V. (2023). Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence: The Fusion of Advanced Technologies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27166-3
Glaser, B. G. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: theoretical coding. The Sociology Press
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Goodyear, P. (2022). Realising the good university: Social innovation, care, design justice and educational infrastructure. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00253-5
Grove O’Grady, A. (2020). Towards a pedagogy of empathy. In Pedagogy, empathy and praxis. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39526-1_4
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth-generation evaluation. SAGE.
Gupta, P. (2020). Best Practices Of Peer To Peer Learning. EdTechReview. https://edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/4451-best-practices-of-peer-to-peer-learning
Gurevych, S. A., Мokliuk, M., Shaposhnikova, I., Gordiichuk, G., & Saiapina, S. (2021). Using Augmented Reality Technology in Higher Education Institutions. Postmodern Openings, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.2/299
Gurjee, Ridwanah, An Investigation into Mentoring Relationships of Higher Education Students in Community Settings, Journal of Peer Learning, 13(1), 2020, 48-60. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol13/iss1/5
Hajirasouli, & Banihashemi, S. (2022). Augmented reality in architecture and construction education: state of the field and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00343-9
Haugum, M.H. & Woldseth, M. V. (2022). Facilitating Different Approaches to Learning Anatomy in an Augmented Reality Environment. Norwegian University of Sciences and Technology: Trondheim. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3024694
Hayes, C. and Fulton, J. A. (2019). A Participatory Action Research study on the impact of Peer Assisted Student Support (PASS) and Supplemental Instruction (S.I.) by international PhD students. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 14. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i14.477
Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks: size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media & Society, 2(2), 195-225.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. SAGE.
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind (3rd ed). McGraw-Hill.
Holmes, G. H., & Abington-Cooper, M. (2001). Pedagogy vs andragogy: A false dichotomy? Journal of Technology Studies, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v26i2.a.8
Hrastinski, S., Keller, C., & Carlsson, S. A. (2010). Design exemplars for synchronous e-learning: a design theory approach. Computer & Education, 55(2), 652-662.
Hu Tianyu et al. (2017) Overview of augmented reality technology. Computer Knowledge and Technology, 34: 194-196 (in Chinese).
iPEAR resources (2023). Compendium of good praxis. https://i-pear.eu/resources/
iPEAR resources (2023). Toolkit of educational AR apps. https://i-pear.eu/resources/
Jabar, Hidayat, R., Samat, N. A., Rohizan, M. F. H., Rosdin, N. ‘Ain, Salim, N., & Norazhar, S. A. (2022). Augmented Reality Learning in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(15), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i15.5570
Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the Age of Digital Reason. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-077-6
Jdaitawi, & Kan’an, A. F. (2022). A Decade of Research on the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality on Students with Special Disability in Higher Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep332. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11369
Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(5), 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03681.x
Kucuk, S., Kapakin, S., & Goktas, Y. (2018). Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(5), 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1742
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Bossu, C., Coughlan, T., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Sargent, J., Scanlon, E., Tang, J., Wang, Q., Whitelock, D., Zhang, S. (2021). Innovating Pedagogy 2021: Open University Innovation Report 9. The Open University. https://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/innovating/
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Loup-Escande, E., Frenoy, R., Poplimont, G., Thouvenin, I., Gapenne, O., &Megalakaki, O. (2017). Contributions of mixed reality in a calligraphy learning task: Effects of supplementary visual feedback and expertise on cognitive load, user experience and gestural performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.006
Lu, Wong, C. S. K., Cheung, R. Y. H., & Im, T. S. W. (2021). Supporting Flipped and Gamified Learning with Augmented Reality in Higher Education. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.623745
Makhortova, K. (2023). Learning impact evaluation of peer learning and immersion in AR. Norwegian University of Sciences and Technology. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/3085711
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice-Hall.
Menzies, V., Tredinnick, J., & Van Ryt, C. (2015) Practices to enhance peer program implementation integrity to safeguard peer leaders and learners. In Field, R & Nelson, K (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2015 Students Transitions Achievement Retention and Success (STARS) Conference. The Office for Learning and Teaching (OLT), Australia, pp. 1-5. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/84982/
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Augmented reality. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/augmented%20reality
Merry, S., & Orsmond, P. (2020). Peer assessment: The role of relational learning through communities of practice. Studies in Higher Education, 45(7), 1312–1322.
Mihai, A. (2023, February 13). What Do You See? Educationalist. https://educationalist.substack.com/p/what-do-you-see
Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A. & Pellas, N. (2022). A systematic mapping review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1883–1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1
Nesenbergs, Abolins, V., Ormanis, J., & Mednis, A. (2021). Use of augmented and virtual reality in remote higher education: A systematic umbrella review. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci1101000
Niemi, H. (2021). AI in learning: Preparing grounds for future learning. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909211038105
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
O’Banion, Lewis, N. S., Boyce, M. W., Laughlin, J., & Majkowicz, D. C. (2022). Use of an augmented reality sand table for satellite remote sensing education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 47(4), 685-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2022.2087215
Olasina, G. (2022). Augmented Reality in Higher Education: The New Reality of Teaching and Learning during and Post-COVID-19. Ubiquitous Learning, 16(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v16i01/31-54
Osika, A., MacMahon, S., Lodge, J.M., Carroll, A. (2022, March 18). Emotions and learning: what role do emotions play in how and why students learn? Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/emotions-and-learning-what-role-do-emotions-play-how-and-why-students-learn
Palmer, K. & Blake, D. (November 08, 2018) How to Help Your Employees Learn from Others. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/11/how-to-help-your-employees-learn-from-each-other
Parchoma, G. (2005). Roles and relationships in virtual environments: A model for adult distance educators extrapolated from leadership in experiences in virtual organisations. International Journal on E-Learning, 4(4), 463-487. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4825/
Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, Cognition, and Learning. Elsevier.
Pentland, A. (2014). Social Physics: how good ideas spread – the lessons from a new science. Penguin.
Pentland, A. (2020, March 25). Managing the Flow of Ideas in a Pandemic. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/managing-the-flow-of-ideas-in-a-pandemic/
Power, Clare; Huijser, Henk; and Rathnayaka, Charith, Editorial: Focus on Peer Leaders and Peer Learning in Different National and Disciplinary Contexts. Journal of Peer Learning, 15(1), 2022, 1-3. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol15/iss1/1
Radu, J., Joy, T., Bowman, Y., Bott, I., Schneider, B. (2021, April). A Survey of Needs and Features for Augmented Reality Collaborations in Collocated Spaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 5, Issue CSCW1, Article No.: 169, pp 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449243
Ravna, O. V. (2021). Towards teaching neuroanatomy in collaborative augmented reality. Norwegian University of Sciences and Technology. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2823492
Rawson, Rebecca and Rhodes, Christine, Peer-Assisted Learning Online: Peer Leader Motivations and Experiences. Journal of Peer Learning, 15(1), 32-47. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol15/iss1/4
Rodríguez-Abad, C., Fernández-de-la-Iglesia, J.-D.-C., Martínez-Santos, A.-E., & Rodríguez-González, R. (2021). A systematic review of augmented reality in health sciences: A guide to decision-making in higher education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084262
Rojas, R. (2017). Emerging team leader dynamics in contingent situations: A doctoral-level simulation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 186-191. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1135839
Safari, M., Yazdanpanah, B., Yazdanpanah, S. &Yazdanpanah, Sh. (2022). The Experiences and Attitudes of Student Tutors to Peer Tutoring in the Class Time of the Gynecology and Infertility Course. Journal of Peer Learning, 15(1), 66-78. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol15/iss1/6
Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1366–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269672
Sankey, M. (2020). Putting the pedagogic horse in front of the technology cart. Journal of Distance Education in China, 5. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2020.05.006
Selden, L. (2005). On Grounded Theory – with some malice. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 114-129.
Simon, B., Cutts, Q. (2012). Peer Instruction: A Teaching Method to Foster Deep Understanding, Communications of the ACM, 55(2), pp. 27-29, https://doi.org/10.1145/2076450.2076459
Situmorang, R., Kustandi, C., Maudiarti, S., Widyaningrum, R., & Ariani, D. (2021). Entrepreneurship Education Through Mobile Augmented Reality for Introducing SMEs in Higher Education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(3), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i03.18437
Smith, C.P. (2018). Body-based activities in secondary geometry: An analysis of learning and viewpoint. School Science and Mathematics, 118(5), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12279
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Soutthaboualy, C.P., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2022). Interactive Augmented Reality Technology via Blended Instruction Lesson on Cloud. Higher Education Studies, 12(3), 9. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v12n3p9
Stephenson, K. (1998). What Knowledge Tears Apart, Networks Make Whole. Reprinted from Internal Communication Focus, 36. http://www.workecology.com/articles/icf.pdf
Sutton, M. & Allen, K. (2019). EMOTIFY!: The power of the human element in game-based learning, serious games and experiential education. E.I. Games LLC. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.2.18
Szeto, Wai Man; Li, Kenneth Ming; Wu, Vivian Jun; Wong, Isaac Ka Tai; Cheng, Anthony Hoi Wa; and Leung, Mei Yee. (2022). A Student Perspective on the Effectiveness of PASS in Seminar Courses: A Mixed-Method Study, Journal of Peer Learning, 15(1), 48-65. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol15/iss1/5
Themeli, C., & Prasolova-Førland, E. (2023). Inclusive Peer Learning Pedagogy with Augmented Reality – iPEAR. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 9(1). https://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/phs/vol9/iss1/2/
Themelis, C. (2023). Inclusive Peer-To-Peer Learning with Augmented Reality (i-PEAR): Reflections on Praxis and Future Trends. Proceedings of the iPEAR conference, Athens, Greece, May-June 2023. https://i-pear.eu/resources/
Themelis, C (2022). Pedagogy of Tele-Proximity for eLearning. Bridging the Distance with Social Physics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270324
Themelis, C. Sime, J-A. Thornberg, R. (2022). Informed Grounded Theory: A symbiosis of philosophy, methodology, and art. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 67(7), 1086-1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115135
Themelis, C & Sime, J-A. (2020) Mapping the field of digital well-being education: A compendium of innovative practices and open educational resources. Lancaster University. http://www.digital-wellbeing.eu/download/12584/
Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2012). Grounded theory. In S. D. Lapan, M. Quartaroli, & F. Reimer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 41-67). John Wiley/Jossey-Bass.
Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of qualitative analysis (pp. 153–169). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n11
Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x
Topouzova, L. (2021) Truth and subjectivity in narrative inquiry: augmented reality & digital storytelling in the university classroom, Journal of Visual Literacy, 40(2), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902045
Topping, K.J. (2023) Advantages and Disadvantages of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Learning in Higher Education: A Review. Education Sciences, 13(4), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040326
Vergroesen, L.L (2020, August 27) Why Peer Learning is the Future of Remote Learning. Eduflow. https://www.eduflow.com/blog/why-peer-learning-isthe-future-of-remote-learning
Walker, S., & Hobson, J. (2014) Interventions in teaching first-year law: Feeding forward to improve learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 326–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.832728
Waring, M., & Evans, C. (2015). Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746159
Wong, Tsang, K. C. K., & Chiu, W.-K. (2021). Using Augmented Reality as a Powerful and Innovative Technology to Increase Enthusiasm and Enhance Student Learning in Higher Education Chemistry Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(11), 3476–3485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01029
Woolhouse, C., Nicholson, L. (2020). Introduction. In C. Woolhouse, & L. J. Nicholson (Eds.), Mentoring in higher education: Case studies of peer learning and pedagogical development (pp. 1-14). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030468897
Woolley, S. R., Butler, M. H., & Wampler, K. S. (2000). Unravelling change in therapy: Three different process research methodologies. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 28(4), 311-327.
Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2020). ‘Current status, opportunities, and challenges of augmented reality in education’. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Yale, A. (2020). Developing Positive Personal Tutor Relationships. In C. Woolhouse, & L. Nicholson (Eds.), Mentoring in Higher Education: Case Studies of Peer Learning and Pedagogical Development (1st ed., pp. 75-94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46890-3_5
Yildiz. (2022). Augmented Reality Applications in Education: Arloopa Application Example. Higher Education Studies, 12(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v12n2p47
Zhang, P., Ding, L. & Mazur, E. (2017). Peer Instruction in introductory physics: A method of bringing about positive changes in students’ attitudes and beliefs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010104
