577

After all, we know that the late Peter Smith  looked for help in finding Clinton’s deleted emails on the dark web. Now we have just learned that Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, Joseph Schmitz, was also seeking her emails on the dark web concurrently. 

“A former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser in the summer of 2016 asked multiple federal agencies, including the FBI, to review material obtained from the “dark web” that he believed to be content from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton‘s deleted emails.”

“Joseph Schmitz, formerly a Pentagon inspector general and then a member of the Trump campaign’s national security and foreign policy team, reportedly found the unverified material through a client, who remains an unidentified contractor. He brought it to at least two federal agencies and two congressional committees, CNN reported. ”

Seth Abramson argues that Peter Smith was his client.

Indeed, it’s like Malcom Nance says-Nance’s Law: coincidences take a lot of planning.

To be sure, these emails were fake.

“CNN’s sources said the material from Schmitz was never verified and was considered fake. One expert who reviewed the material told CNN the “dark web” source made the material more questionable. The “dark web” is the part of the internet that is difficult to trace.”

“Schmitz also brought the information to the State Department and the intelligence community inspector general for review, according to CNN. He expressed concern that viewing potentially classified information could compromise his security clearance as well as his client’s.”

“When the government agencies and watchdogs declined to review the material after interviewing Schmitz, the campaign official then listed his concerns in a memo he provided to the House Intelligence Committee, a congressional panel simultaneously probing Russia’s interference in the election.”

Abramson questions why these Congressional committees didn’t disclose this:

Oh, yeah, by the way Schmitz was also a friend and former colleague of Erik Prince at Blackwater. Were they the same fake emails Prince was peddling?

Again, coincidences take a lot of planning. 

UPDATE: In Chapter A I conjecture if the fake Clinton emails Schmitz peddled to the FBI-aka Trumpland-contained the fake Russian document Comey used as a pretext for his extremely careless press conference.

Regarding Smith, Abramson has argued that he was the Trump campaign’s designated cutout in trying to locate Clinton’s emails.

Regarding Schmitz, CNN sources state there’s no reason to believe he spoke to the Russians.

“CNN’s sources said there was no reason to suspect Schmitz had communicated with Russians over the course of the campaign. It remains unknown whether special counsel Robert Mueller, who took over the Russia investigation from the FBI last year, is interested in speaking with Schmitz.”

Ok, but there’s no reason to believe he didn’t either. For his part, Peter Smith did claim to have been contacted by the Russians during his search on the dark web.

Keep in mind that Smith had emailed all of these above named high ranking Trump campaign officials about his search for the emails. And Smith’s main contact with the campaign was Michael Flynn who was Trump’s-true-top foreign policy adviser. Smith was very close to both Flynn and his son.

Along with Prince-who was CEO while Schmitz was COO at Blackwater.

So-very close to Flynn and his son-and he and Prince were the top guys at Blackwater; and, again, Prince and Flynn were Trump’s de facto real top foreign policy advisers. As for Schmitz, his role in the Trump campaign was: a foreign policy adviser.

By the way, Schmitz and Erik Prince both took trips to Hungary during the campaign.

So Nunes finally defines what would rise to the level of a criminal conspiracy to steal the election from its rightful winner, Hillary Clinton.

Again, coincidences take a lot of planning.

License

October 28, 2016: a Day That Will Live in Infamy Copyright © by . All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book