256
Congress Already Has Evidence Trump Lied Under Oath to Robert Mueller
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/22/robert-muellers-testimony-seems-destined-disappoint-democrats-could-make-it-worthwhile/?utm_term=.4af217031f9a
Rashida Tlaib for Speaker https://t.co/mvyks3JbnR
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 22, 2019
Warren says it: Dems can't keep playing by a separate set of rules than McConnell and Friends where the GOP 'twists everything and Democrats keep trotting along' https://t.co/OPQdyBTjnz
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 22, 2019
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/29/the-case-of-al-franken
Just 1 more sign Pelosi doesn't take this seriously. After running out the clock she will later be saying 'Sorry but we can't impeach him it's too close to the election'
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 21, 2019
Democrats Are Setting Themselves Up to Fail on Mueller Hearings
Is your Representative on this list? Call them today: https://t.co/wjn1OJVucDhttps://t.co/3z4twhkj6Q
— Need To Impeach 🍑 (@Need2Impeach) July 19, 2019
The House Dems are our last chance and it doesn't look good. We must force the issue with them. Forget locking Trump up-SDNY dropped the case-probably at Coverup AG Barr's direction
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 19, 2019
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/07/lawrence-odonnell-reports-on-the-growing-movement-for-the-impeachment-of-president-donald-trump/?utm_source=push_notifications
Notably, more than a dozen lawmakers who already favor an impeachment inquiry voted to sideline Green’s articles of impeachment. Several argued that Green’s focus on Trump’s racism excluded other evidence of potentially impeachable offenses like obstruction of justice.
“We’re not going to take someone and say, ‘Well let’s charge him with manslaughter when he committed mass murder,’’” said Rep. Val Demings of Florida.
See I look at it this way: if someone commmitted mass murder I’d rather get him for manslaughter than nothing-the choice wasn’t between charging him with manslaughter and mass murder but charging him with manslaughter and charging him with nothing. In taht sense I disagree with those Like Congresswoman Demings who voted for nothing.
Remember this wasn’t a vote to impeach but simply a vote not to table it. The best choice no doubt was Nadler’s preference-to send it to the Judiciary-effectively opening an inquiry.
Nothing like an idea whose time is coming https://t.co/JBvGJlcn1r
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 19, 2019
#hopehicks convo w/ Cohen 'keep praying' underscore fact that Cohen committed crimes at direction of 'President Trump' yet while Cohen is in a prison cell, Trump is hailed as 'Mr President' and the opposition party votes to table an impeachment inquiry https://t.co/QkMDhlQnIR
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
Speaking of history the majority supported Hitler-so those who opposed him were what? Extremists?
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
For once I have to disagree with Greg Sargent:
Some of the positions House moderates adopt are understandable. I personally favor an impeachment inquiry, but recognize that moderates might have legitimate political hesitations, and also recognize that the arguments against launching one are not wildly absurd. On immigration, the Senate border supplemental that moderates ultimately supported was far worse than the House version in terms of protections for migrants, but the Senate version was far better than nothing, and backing it was not unreasonable.
The reasons for opposing an inquiry are wildly absurd IMO. Certainly they are morally and ethically. If Trump isn’t impeachable who is? Is it time to simply rip this part of the constitution out? I had a debate with Bill Scher who said just because Trump isn’t impeached doesn’t mean a future President can’t be. Really? Who a Democrat for using an email server, Whitewater, or chewing gum?
Sorry I don’t agree that the arguments of Pelosi and Friends deserve such respect-and by treating them respectfully they have all the cover they need-how can you twist their arm if their arguments are respectable?
Morally their arguments are perverse-that you will reward the GOP for being so partisan-ok we know you’ll never convict so we won’t impeach. That is morally obscene-obviously it incentivizes the GOP’s sociopathic partisanship.
Sargent probably means their political arguments are respectable-as those are the only arguments they really make. Of course, impeachment shouldn’t be a matter of political calculus. But even the calculus is dubious.
What this highlights is that while 95 Dems-including Nadler-voted for this, there are many more who didn't who at least support an inquiry. Ie the number of Dems who support an inquiry is considerably higher even than 95
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
Everyone with a Dem Rep should demand they do a townhall and explain why they don't want to impeach Trump https://t.co/aX96OxYiXk
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
Interesting thread but disagree that Senate acquittal is a major PR win. No reason to fear acquittal and by JD's own analysis a failure to impeach elevates Trump to a tyrant-and legitimizes him for history-which matters for the future https://t.co/ZXz32LTrNB
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
Having said that I think in the end they should send it to the Senate. Let McConnell and Friends go on record protecting all this criminal and illegitimate behavior. A lot of GOP Senators in swing districts for 2020 will have to explain
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/06/03/here-are-seven-reasons-trump-should-be-impeached/?utm_term=.aa424db356fb
This has been my argument for 2 years-that the best political setup could be impeachment WITHOUT REMOVAL https://t.co/hIIv5ZvA3Q
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
Here's the choice Dems face:
1. Election alone against incumbent.
2. Election plus damaging year-long impeachment inquiry that cracks open all of Trump's corruption in public, under oath, with courts compelling testimony and quashing executive privilege.
Which would you choose?— Tom Watson (@tomwatson) July 18, 2019
Trump has broken the law, violated the Constitution, and put the future of our democracy at risk.
We've had ENOUGH. It’s past time for an impeachment inquiry.
This August recess, we're bringing the fight home. WATCH to learn how—then sign up to join us: https://t.co/E9jmZok2Kp pic.twitter.com/CypTPD4l3h
— By the People 🗽🇺🇸 #RemoveTrump (@by_the_ppl) July 17, 2019
Yes call out those who remain silent-or don't use their power like the Dem leadership
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
This is a really sad thread-all the Dem frustration in Tapper's thread is directed not at 'President Trump' but AOC https://t.co/vg2078iSB2
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
This thread is instructive for many reasons but one is House Dems’ absurd sense of their role in 2020. Their preoccupation with a positive agenda is groupthink. At best it’s a placeholder. Dems will have a presidential nominee & whoever it is will make their agenda irrelevant. https://t.co/2lVvXyL0rZ
— Adam Jentleson (@AJentleson) July 18, 2019
Benghazi had a Select Committee; Pelosi falsely claims that a SC would somehow hurt the various committee investigations-the opposite is the truth. Let's be clear-Benghazi won it-Emailgate came out of it
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
Someone has to tell Nancy Chamberlain Pelosi this
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
AMEN. Great minds think alike-I've been arguing Trump is Hitler but Pelosi is Neville Chamberlain. I've also argued that you HAVE to threaten not to vote in 2020. If you don't then they can dismiss you as you have no leverage. They must learn they ignore us at their peril
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 18, 2019
https://twitter.com/ScallionOh/status/1151609201552179201
House Democrats are working WITH Republicans to avoid launching an impeachment inquiry. Let that sink in.
A. Day. After. They. Condemned. Trump. For. Being. A. Racist. https://t.co/OGv3o5WtFO
— Indivisible Guide (@IndivisibleTeam) July 17, 2019
https://twitter.com/JustSchmeltzer/status/1151551045618683905
Once again, Democrats act like their ridiculously slow pace in going to court to compel cooperation with subpoenas is part of some master plan and not about running out the clock on impeachment.https://t.co/fb6OWs0HYP
— Matt Fuller (@MEPFuller) July 17, 2019
The Party of Trump who says it's ok to collude with a foreign government to 'win' an election is worried about the RULES. It's also interesting to know what you consider 'harassment' Meanwhile kids in cages you're not worried about
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 17, 2019
Are they really "building a record of White House resistance to testimony from Mueller witnesses" or are they just-deliberately-running out the clock? https://t.co/jxIrbxv2RT
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 17, 2019
What the hell happened in March of 2019?
We spoke to @sarahkendzior about how all the momentum toward holding Trump accountable in the House seemed to die in March, right around the same time the SDNY investigation into the Trump Organization was iced.https://t.co/PFQRPQxnQx
— L O L G O P (@LOLGOP) July 16, 2019
https://twitter.com/libbycwatson/status/1150932432616660992
What's the definition of insanity again? https://t.co/45oictpdNX
— Rebecca Katz (@RebeccaKKatz) July 16, 2019
Yes!!! 💪 💪 💪 https://t.co/RzgjGQcLKR
— Adam Jentleson (@AJentleson) July 16, 2019
If only this were satire but I knew Richie Neal would hem and haw https://t.co/KeEe1FILeN
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 17, 2019
John Lewis on the House floor: "With this vote, we stand with our sisters, three were born in America and one came here looking for a better vote. With this vote, we meet our moral obligation to condemn hate, racism, and bigotry in every form. Thank you." Applause breaks out.
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) July 16, 2019
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/07/dear-nevertrumpers-either-help-or-stfu/?utm_source=push_notifications
https://twitter.com/tombellin/status/1150438938835861505
Agreed! Here's how I see Nancy Pelosi and the Dem leadership https://t.co/ZSkvzgC9j0:
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 14, 2019
1) An impeachment inquiry opens in the House. 2) The nation is riveted by televised hearings that detail Trump’s crimes, corruption and obstruction. 3) His support plummets among swing voters. 4) An energized base turns out in record numbers. 5) Trump is soundly defeated in 2020.
— Jon Cooper (@joncoopertweets) July 14, 2019
1. The infighting in the Democratic Party right now can all be traced back to the decision NOT to impeach Trump
Why aren't Democrats unified and focused on opposing Trump?
Because Democratic leadership decided opposing Trump shouldn't be the focus of this Congress
— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) July 14, 2019
This brings me some hope for Steyer
We need televised hearings to put the truth in front of the American people. Congrats @RepJerryNadler. Let the light shine on the dark deeds of this administration.https://t.co/OBMraWqwzh
— Tom Steyer (@TomSteyer) July 11, 2019
They're so focused on trying to get some sort of legislation passed so they can claim a bipartisan victory, they're not paying attention to their constituents.
Do we want a higher min. wage? Yes.
But if the GOP/ Trump are held accountable, they'll have the opportunity to do it.— Hoot-n-Nanny🦉🦉 (@hawklyf49) July 13, 2019
The party of Neville Chamberlain
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 13, 2019
So Hillary testified on Benghazi for 11 hours and they made fun of her 'stamina' and Mueller can't manage more than 2 hours? Jamie Raskin can't ask questions? What is Pelosi doing? https://t.co/f2ahZZ6hJz
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 13, 2019
As much as I’ve had my hair on fire over what the Speaker is up to this one looks pretty good for her in retrospect. Will that apply more generally? Time will tell
Nancy Pelosi on Acosta: "Thank God he's gone."https://t.co/ZZcSFSvdLq
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) July 12, 2019
Kind of like I'm always beating on the Dem leadership for the same exact reason https://t.co/KpToDSUqYB
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 12, 2019
Kind of like I'm always beating on the Dem leadership for the same exact reason https://t.co/KpToDSUqYB
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 12, 2019
#ThingsYouDontBringToAGunFight I'm going to say the Democratic party leadership for $200
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 12, 2019
Steyer didn't do well and I'm now reconsidering myself as it seems his campaign strategy is to NOT TALK ABOUT IMPEACHMENT either. Why then do we need another candidate talking about campaign finance?
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 12, 2019
Pelosi seems to think it's normal and BORING
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 12, 2019
Major protest against Trump AND Pelosi Well she did allow him to continue with the detentions https://t.co/OhaYrSgY4l
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 12, 2019
I’m sorry, @SpeakerPelosi, but it feels like you’re focused on consolidating your own power rather than risking the power you have to help us in our direst moment. I’m the most sympathetic audience you have. If you’re losing me, you’re in trouble. https://t.co/AzqcM3E0vP
— Bradley Whitford (@BradleyWhitford) July 11, 2019
Second Dem of the day backs impeachment inquiry >>> https://t.co/O2igHvjD4o
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) July 11, 2019
Professor Allan Lichtman who has correctly predicted the last 9 presidential elections predicts Donald Trump will win in 2020 "unless Democrats grow a spine and do their Constitutional duty to impeach.” I agree 1000%, which is why I’ve been advocating so strongly for impeachment.
— Power to the People ☭🕊 (@ProudSocialist) July 11, 2019
I've been bullish on Steyer's entry but what he says here concerns me a little. The ONLY value he can bring to the campaign is to beat the impeachment drum. If he's going to talk about normal issues nope https://t.co/SUYmO4Xd0y
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 11, 2019
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/07/11/steyer_from_impeachment_agitator_to_2020_candidate__140752.html
I would urge House Democrats to focus on Trump, his corruption, kleptocracy, lawlessness and atrocities. That’s what we elected you to do-to put a check on this tryant, who is meanwhile seizing power at your expense. Soon it will be too late to stop and hold him accountable!
— Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈 (@Amy_Siskind) July 11, 2019
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/10/pelosi-progressives-twitter-1405763
So we've lost an Eric Swalwell but gained a Tom Steyer-for related reasons… Regarding Steyer what's closet to your point of view?
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 10, 2019
Me too! I don't care that Tom is a billionaire as he's the only candidate who takes the Trump threat seriously and is running on a strong impeachment platform
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 10, 2019
When Trump’s approval rating is increasing and now at the highest of his presidency at 44% it means that @SpeakerPelosi and @HouseDemocrats’ strategy is NOT working and it’s time to shift gears, go on offense, control the narrative, and defend the Constitution. #ImpeachTrumpNow
— Power to the People ☭🕊 (@ProudSocialist) July 10, 2019
So she's basically given up on not just impeachment but any meaningful Oversight whatsoever. Her focus is messaging bills that McConnell throws in the waste paper basket
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 10, 2019
She's the most powerful woman in the country and is supposed to be coequal to Trump but she's becoming the Shrugger in Chief https://t.co/Tolb9OfUDE
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 10, 2019
The article of faith of my friends who want to believe the best about the Speaker is that it will get better soon or at some point. What if this is it? What if it never gets better? If so I'm willing to admit I was wrong-to advocate so hard for her to be Speaker again
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 10, 2019
Seems to me Trump's Russia House is worrying unnecessarily Pelosi probably wouldn't see that as 'worth it' https://t.co/4oaiQnVXm8
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 9, 2019
To Pelosi's claim the Democrats are winning without an impeachment inquiry-the Trump legal team is literally using her public statement against impeachment as a rationale for not cooperating with House Oversight https://t.co/fCmyaAVenV
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 8, 2019
I actually think that maybe a Steyer candidacy is a good thing at this point. Not because he will win but someone needs to make impeachment front and center in this campaign https://t.co/IwnxabO34s
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 8, 2019
Pelosi's weird reason for not impeaching Trump: 'You can't impeach everybody.; Ok but if you don't think Trump should be impeached you're saying 'You can't impeach anybody' https://t.co/fCmyaAVenV
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 8, 2019
Pelosi sees no role for Congress regarding the 'President' being credibly accused of rape. Meanwhile the GOP impeached Clinton over a consensual affair. Sorry but this is downright anti feminist https://t.co/QCTPWuviLd
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 8, 2019
Pelosi's weird reason for not impeaching Trump: 'You can't impeach everybody.; Ok but if you don't think Trump should be impeached you're saying 'You can't impeach anybody' https://t.co/fCmyaAVenV
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 8, 2019
As @mehdirhasan points out, we're now at the point where Trump's lawyers are citing the refusal to launch an impeachment inquiry as their argument against House Dem oversight of Trump:https://t.co/qUQcuYTbDw pic.twitter.com/rf21tR266v
— Greg Sargent (@GregTSargent) July 7, 2019
This article is even worse than it looks-Dowd takes the trouble to contrast Pelosi with Clinton-allegedly Pelosi knows how to be a powerful woman in politics the correct way-Hillary was too shrill https://t.co/cYOS73lexG
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 7, 2019
What's becoming clearer and clearer is that Pelosi is convinced Trump will beat himself-the Dems should just get out of the way and talk about anodyne message bills and the election will take care of itself-and oh what's the Rule of Law anyway? Just an abstraction
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 7, 2019
Regarding Bunch's question it's 'asked and answered' as the lawyers say 'asked and answered'
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 7, 2019
Trusting Maureen Dowd on anything is a mistake. She pillow-talked with Trump week after week in 2016, & pissed on Hillary whenever she could. If you believe this Superwoman Pelosi bullshit, you'll believe doing nothing to take Trump down is smart politics. https://t.co/2tNNyrc498 pic.twitter.com/LWxWuzF64i
— Blind Willies (@williesband) July 7, 2019
Justin Amash on Pelosi's punting on impeachment: 'from a principled moral perspective she's making a mistake; from a political strategic position she's making a mistake'
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 7, 2019
I have some disagreements with AOC ideologically but agree with her point by point here. She sees things so much more clearly than the Old Guard-Biden even now is talking about 'working with Mitch McConnell' and rules out court packing or term limits.
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 6, 2019
Love that @AOC got bleeped out in the Post. We call them “grown up words” in our house. https://t.co/v9McdW3noG pic.twitter.com/JYQvSdo8fL
— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) July 6, 2019
We have to be watchful of this: I am trying to have laughs at times to release stress, but kidding aside, things are quite dire. I fear we don’t start an impeachment inquiry soon, our democracy as we know it will be lost for at least a generation.https://t.co/RVdImTRmdd
— Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈 (@Amy_Siskind) July 6, 2019
45% are for impeaching Trump. Some context, that is higher than Clinton and for Nixon:
"From June 1973 to Jan 1974, between 19% and 38% agreed he should be "impeached and compelled to leave the presidency. In April 1974, support for removing Nixon at 46%."https://t.co/eLRWxh82x7— Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈 (@Amy_Siskind) July 6, 2019
Hate to say it but Pelosi and Trump agree on one thing-both want to run out the clock on any accountability for him
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 6, 2019
I agree with you 1000%. This is why personally I'm ambivalent about all this 2020 hoopla that acts as if Trump 'won' 2016 legitimately. While he needs to be removed in 2020 even more importantly he needs to be expunged #ImpeachmentInquiryNow #ImpeachTheMFTraitor
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 6, 2019
However Congressman he will probably have Coverup AG Barr investigate these fake allegations before you folks in leadership take seriously the investigations into the real allegations of 2016
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 6, 2019
No, Merrick Garland should not be nominated to the Supreme Court by Democrats in 2021. Absolutely not. What was, in effect, a compromise pick by Obama in 2016 is a political and judicial lifetime away from the nominees of the next administration, should a Democrat defeat Trump.
— Chris “Law Dork” Geidner (@chrisgeidner) July 5, 2019
This is smart. She's in a very good position to be the nominee but she needs to understand what her base wants: to bring the attack to the enemy-'President Trump' https://t.co/zszwlzbB9x
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 4, 2019
As much as I love Kamala Harris and think she will be the nominee she needs to be the leader on holding Trump accountable and calling for pushback and consequences. Appeal to her Dem colleagues in the House
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 3, 2019
Outrageous as Trump’s “Salute to America” is – diverting millions of park funds, rolling in tanks, giving VIP access to GOP donors, politicizing a nonpartisan event, etc. – notice he is getting away with it all. And suffering no consequences and almost no pushback from Congress.
— Amy Siskind 🏳️🌈 (@Amy_Siskind) July 3, 2019
Next month “the 2020 elections are the real impeachment” 😰 pic.twitter.com/7xRNd60rEY
— the elections will not stop the fascism (@benFranklin2018) July 3, 2019
Exactly-Trump is the American Hitler and Pelosi is emerging as: the American Neville Chamberlain-who thought the answer was appeasing Hitler
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 3, 2019
As usual she'll offer at best a few worried words not backed up by any action. She and the entire Dem leadership team seems allergic to using their hard won power
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) July 3, 2019
Blake gets legitimacy exactly backwards. It's not that unless we can show beyond a reasonable doubt-ie +90%-that Trump is illegitimate we just have to presume he is. To the contrary confidence requires the opposite-there must be no reasonable doubt that the POTUS IS legitimate
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 28, 2019
We'll see what the polls say but the futures markets have no doubt Kamala Harris hit not just a home run but a grand slam https://t.co/5nBCWK6PZb
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 28, 2019
The real danger for the country is legitimizing Trump's illegitimate 'win' https://t.co/wkdVJXNrCw
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 28, 2019
Jimmy Carter gets it
Jimmy Carter: "Everyday we send a disgraceful signal around the world, that this is what the present U.S. government stands for, and that is torture and kidnapping of little children."
He called the tactics of ICE "a disgrace to the United States."https://t.co/CY4ax1Qqk8
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) June 28, 2019
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1144466268663083008
Kamala Harris Makes the Case That Joe Biden Should Pass That Torch to Her https://t.co/JXszHQf8Rd
— Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) June 28, 2019
He and Putin are literally laughing about it, @SpeakerPelosi when will you wake up? #ImpeachmentHearingsNow #ImpeachTrumpNow #ImpeachTheMFTraitor
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 28, 2019
Sen. Kamala Harris Mega Thread!
I'll be using this thread to compile all my threads ( covering policies/interviews/etc) on Kamala's campaign. Feel free to bookmark/share any or all of these threads for when you need to pull out receipts or just want to learn more! #ForThePeople pic.twitter.com/TfWaXSpS9m— Reecie @BlackWomenViews (@ReecieColbert) April 23, 2019
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/28/democratic-debate-results-1386169
https://www.alternet.org/2019/06/democrats-are-completely-mishandling-the-new-rape-allegation-against-trump-heres-what-they-should-do-instead/
Last night the Dem candidates were asked the biggest geopolitical threat and said CHINA. That's Trump's answer. Only De Blasio got it right-Russia OF COURSE
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
You can call her Neville Chamberlain 2.0 OR Ms. See No Evil Hear No Evil
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
Comparatively the GOP would attack Clinton 60 nights per debate in 2016
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
YES I expect Biden to bring it tonight. If he's smart he'll attack Trump early and often
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
I hope I'm right too. I agree Dems are like Mcfly. I guess I'm giving them that strategy for now. Let's touch base again in a few months.🙂
— Mary Lauzet (@MaryLauzet) June 27, 2019
No matter what Trump does they just go on coloring between the lines playing a symmetric game against his asymmetry
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
Overall last night was Kumbaya debate. No one attacked Trump no one attacked leaders Biden & Warren. Castro helped himself a little by going after a weak sister like Beto. De Blasio a little fire. Dems should listen to Morning Joe-never thought I'd say it https://t.co/Raf2KIBg3W
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
I mean was surprised the 2nd tier candidates didn't hit him or Biden-Warren
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
But if you're a candidate struggling to break out that would have been the way to do it. As it i the frontrunners won-Biden and Warren-while Trump had nothing to worry about
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
I think Ms. Perez is probably right on tactics-there was a desire for it to be a Kumbaya debate which it largely was.
that might make Tom Perez and Nancy Pelosi happy but was it the best choice for struggling 2nd tier candidates?
#JulianCastro2020 Castro did what he needed to do-at least no one is asking who he is now. That was the job of many of the 2nd tier candidates
— Expand the Court (@ProChoiceMike) June 27, 2019
https://twitter.com/amyannperez121/status/1144206341130588161